GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs GTX 275

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 275 and GeForce RTX 2060 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 275
2009
896 MB GDDR3, 219 Watt
3.67

RTX 2060 Super outperforms GTX 275 by a whopping 1068% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking67677
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3529.50
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGT200BTuring TU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 January 2009 (15 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $399
Current price$82 (0.3x MSRP)$374 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 Super has 8329% better value for money than GTX 275.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402176
CUDA cores240no data
Core clock speed633 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt175 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate50.6 billion/sec224.4
Floating-point performance673.9 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)229 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount896 MB8 GB
Memory bus width448 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1134 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC supportno data+
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.04.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 275 3.67
RTX 2060 Super 42.88
+1068%

RTX 2060 Super outperforms GTX 275 by 1068% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 275 1416
RTX 2060 Super 16559
+1069%

RTX 2060 Super outperforms GTX 275 by 1069% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−1080%
118
+1080%
1440p5−6
−1280%
69
+1280%
4K3−4
−1400%
45
+1400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 88
−1036%
1000−1050
+1036%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 101
−1039%
1150−1200
+1039%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
−1011%
900−950
+1011%
Battlefield 5 163
−1066%
1900−1950
+1066%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
−1027%
1150−1200
+1027%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
−1039%
900−950
+1039%
Far Cry 5 130
−1054%
1500−1550
+1054%
Far Cry New Dawn 144
−1046%
1650−1700
+1046%
Forza Horizon 4 152
−1051%
1750−1800
+1051%
Hitman 3 94
−1017%
1050−1100
+1017%
Horizon Zero Dawn 231
−1047%
2650−2700
+1047%
Metro Exodus 144
−1046%
1650−1700
+1046%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
−1048%
1400−1450
+1048%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 228
−1062%
2650−2700
+1062%
Watch Dogs: Legion 104
−1054%
1200−1250
+1054%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85
−1018%
950−1000
+1018%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
−1003%
750−800
+1003%
Battlefield 5 150
−1067%
1750−1800
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
−1058%
1100−1150
+1058%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
−1027%
800−850
+1027%
Far Cry 5 108
−1057%
1250−1300
+1057%
Far Cry New Dawn 106
−1032%
1200−1250
+1032%
Forza Horizon 4 271
−1062%
3150−3200
+1062%
Hitman 3 77
−1004%
850−900
+1004%
Horizon Zero Dawn 293
−1060%
3400−3450
+1060%
Metro Exodus 132
−1036%
1500−1550
+1036%
Red Dead Redemption 2 121
−1057%
1400−1450
+1057%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 184
−1041%
2100−2150
+1041%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163
−1066%
1900−1950
+1066%
Watch Dogs: Legion 216
−1057%
2500−2550
+1057%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
−1048%
700−750
+1048%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
−1048%
700−750
+1048%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
−1027%
800−850
+1027%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
−1029%
700−750
+1029%
Far Cry 5 74
−1049%
850−900
+1049%
Forza Horizon 4 120
−1067%
1400−1450
+1067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 131
−1045%
1500−1550
+1045%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156
−1054%
1800−1850
+1054%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
−1018%
950−1000
+1018%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−1002%
650−700
+1002%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
−1040%
1300−1350
+1040%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 96
−1046%
1100−1150
+1046%
Far Cry New Dawn 114
−1040%
1300−1350
+1040%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
−1054%
600−650
+1054%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
−964%
500−550
+964%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70
−1043%
800−850
+1043%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−1025%
450−500
+1025%
Far Cry 5 88
−1036%
1000−1050
+1036%
Forza Horizon 4 98
−1022%
1100−1150
+1022%
Hitman 3 58
−1021%
650−700
+1021%
Horizon Zero Dawn 99
−1062%
1150−1200
+1062%
Metro Exodus 87
−1049%
1000−1050
+1049%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
−1040%
1300−1350
+1040%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−994%
700−750
+994%
Watch Dogs: Legion 44
−1036%
500−550
+1036%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 82
−1059%
950−1000
+1059%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
−964%
500−550
+964%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−998%
450−500
+998%
Hitman 3 39
−1054%
450−500
+1054%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−1061%
650−700
+1061%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
−953%
400−450
+953%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
−1002%
650−700
+1002%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
−1043%
400−450
+1043%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 29
−934%
300−310
+934%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−1058%
220−230
+1058%
Far Cry 5 30
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 67
−1019%
750−800
+1019%
Horizon Zero Dawn 56
−1061%
650−700
+1061%
Metro Exodus 49
−1022%
550−600
+1022%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
−1060%
290−300
+1060%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
−971%
450−500
+971%

This is how GTX 275 and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Super is 1080% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 1280% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 1400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.67 42.88
Recency 15 January 2009 2 July 2019
Cost $249 $399
Maximum RAM amount 896 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 175 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 275 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
GeForce GTX 275
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 133 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 11154 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.