FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated631
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.06
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT200BCypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 January 2009 (16 years ago)23 June 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2401600
Core clock speed648 MHz825 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate51.8466.00
Floating-point processing power0.7085 TFLOPS2.64 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8080
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1242 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth159.0 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2009 23 June 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 225 Watt

GTX 285 Mac Edition has 10.3% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and FireStream 9370. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9370 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition or FireStream 9370, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.