GMA X3000 vs GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGT200BBroadwater
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 February 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240no data
Core clock speed633 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)219 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate50.644.000
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPSno data
ROPs281
TMUs808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount896 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width448 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1134 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth127.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 February 2010 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 219 Watt 13 Watt

GTX 275 PhysX Edition has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3000, on the other hand, has 1584.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and GMA X3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition is a desktop card while GMA X3000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
Intel GMA X3000
GMA X3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 28 votes

Rate GMA X3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.