GeForce Go 7700 vs GTX 260

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	714	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.36	no data
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	GT200	G73M-B1
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	16 June 2008 (16 years ago)	1 August 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	no data
Current price	$49 (0.1x MSRP)	$925

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	17
CUDA cores	192	no data
Core clock speed	576 MHz	5 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	450 MHz
Number of transistors	1,400 million	177 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	182 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	36.9 billion/sec	5.400
Floating-point performance	476.9 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 260 and GeForce Go 7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3, GDDR2, GDDR1
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	512 MB
Memory bus width	448 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	999 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	111.9 GB/s	16 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVIHDTV	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	4.0	3.0
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	16 June 2008	1 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount	896 MB	512 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	80 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---