GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB vs GTX 260 216 Rev. 2
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 97 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GT200B | TU106 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 November 2008 (15 years ago) | 7 December 2021 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 216 | 2176 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1650 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 171 Watt | 184 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 41.47 | 224.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 0.5365 gflops | 7.181 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 229 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1998 MHz | 14 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB/s | 336.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 7.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 November 2008 | 7 December 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 171 Watt | 184 Watt |
GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 has 7.6% lower power consumption.
RTX 2060 12 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 1271.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
