Radeon 620 vs GeForce GTX 1660

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 with Radeon 620, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660
2019
6 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
30.33
+1174%

GTX 1660 outperforms 620 by a whopping 1174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187845
Place by popularity40not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.69no data
Power efficiency17.443.28
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameTU116Polaris 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 March 2019 (5 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408384
Core clock speed1530 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate157.124.58
Floating-point processing power5.027 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs8824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2001 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.1 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 30.33
+1174%
Radeon 620 2.38

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 11664
+1172%
Radeon 620 917

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 14164
+719%
Radeon 620 1730

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
+1300%
6−7
−1300%
1440p51
+1175%
4−5
−1175%
4K27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.61no data
1440p4.29no data
4K8.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 72
+620%
10−11
−620%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Elden Ring 84
+2000%
4−5
−2000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Counter-Strike 2 56
+460%
10−11
−460%
Cyberpunk 2077 55
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+1000%
12−14
−1000%
Metro Exodus 95
+3067%
3−4
−3067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 112
+1144%
9−10
−1144%
Valorant 138
+1280%
10−11
−1280%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Counter-Strike 2 48
+380%
10−11
−380%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+800%
5−6
−800%
Dota 2 150
+2900%
5−6
−2900%
Elden Ring 90
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Far Cry 5 145
+936%
14−16
−936%
Fortnite 140−150
+1100%
12−14
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 110
+817%
12−14
−817%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+1817%
6−7
−1817%
Metro Exodus 66
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 216
+882%
21−24
−882%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40
+344%
9−10
−344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+920%
10−11
−920%
Valorant 65
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
World of Tanks 270−280
+523%
40−45
−523%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Counter-Strike 2 43
+330%
10−11
−330%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
+660%
5−6
−660%
Dota 2 197
+3840%
5−6
−3840%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+507%
14−16
−507%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+692%
12−14
−692%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+705%
21−24
−705%
Valorant 115
+1178%
9−10
−1178%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 52
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Elden Ring 47
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Grand Theft Auto V 52 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+706%
16−18
−706%
Red Dead Redemption 2 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
World of Tanks 190−200
+1125%
16−18
−1125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Counter-Strike 2 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+667%
3−4
−667%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1467%
6−7
−1467%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+1240%
5−6
−1240%
Metro Exodus 59
+1375%
4−5
−1375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Valorant 72
+800%
8−9
−800%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Dota 2 49
+206%
16−18
−206%
Elden Ring 21
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+227%
14−16
−227%
Metro Exodus 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 81
+1057%
7−8
−1057%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 49
+227%
14−16
−227%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+900%
1−2
−900%
Dota 2 87
+444%
16−18
−444%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Fortnite 40−45
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+1700%
2−3
−1700%
Valorant 38
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

This is how GTX 1660 and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 is 1300% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 is 1175% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 is 1250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 is 5900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 surpassed Radeon 620 in all 52 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.33 2.38
Recency 14 March 2019 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1660 has a 1174.4% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 140% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop card while Radeon 620 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5462 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.