Radeon HD 6750M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Place in performance ranking	150	802
Place by popularity	34	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.85	0.15
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Turing TU116	Whistler-PRO
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	22 February 2019 (5 years ago)	4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	no data
Current price	$284 (1x MSRP)	$506

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 17133% better value for money than HD 6750M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	480
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,600 million	716 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	169.9	14.40
Floating-point performance	no data	576.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon HD 6750M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.5	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.41
+1281%

HD 6750M 2.42

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 6750M by 1281% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Ti 12926
+1280%

HD 6750M 937

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 6750M by 1280% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti 61217
+1016%

HD 6750M 5483

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 6750M by 1016% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
+1876%

HD 6750M 1159

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti outperforms Radeon HD 6750M by 1876% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	280−290 +1233%	21 −1233%
Full HD	105 +320%	25 −320%
1440p	59 +1375%	4−5 −1375%
4K	38 +1800%	2−3 −1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

78
+1460%

5−6

−1460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	86 +2767%	3−4 −2767%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	74 +1380%	5−6 −1380%
Battlefield 5	129 +3125%	4−5 −3125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120 +991%	10−12 −991%
Cyberpunk 2077	71 +1320%	5−6 −1320%
Far Cry 5	109 +3533%	3−4 −3533%
Far Cry New Dawn	98 +4800%	2−3 −4800%
Forza Horizon 4	131 +2520%	5−6 −2520%
Hitman 3	100−110 +2525%	4−5 −2525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +2300%	3−4 −2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	82 +1540%	5−6 −1540%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	94 +944%	9−10 −944%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	72 +2300%	3−4 −2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55 +1733%	3−4 −1733%
Battlefield 5	112 +2700%	4−5 −2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	89 +709%	10−12 −709%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 +1040%	5−6 −1040%
Far Cry 5	99 +3200%	3−4 −3200%
Far Cry New Dawn	93 +4550%	2−3 −4550%
Forza Horizon 4	122 +2340%	5−6 −2340%
Hitman 3	100−110 +2525%	4−5 −2525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +2300%	3−4 −2300%
Metro Exodus	55 +1733%	3−4 −1733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45 +800%	5−6 −800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	82 +811%	9−10 −811%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	116 +1833%	6−7 −1833%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50 +1567%	3−4 −1567%
Battlefield 5	102 +2450%	4−5 −2450%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +820%	5−6 −820%
Far Cry 5	94 +3033%	3−4 −3033%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +4100%	2−3 −4100%
Forza Horizon 4	97 +1840%	5−6 −1840%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	62 +933%	6−7 −933%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	57 +1040%	5−6 −1040%
Hitman 3	60−65 +1100%	5−6 −1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +411%	9−10 −411%
Metro Exodus	33 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	51 +750%	6−7 −750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +1950%	2−3 −1950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	36 +1700%	2−3 −1700%
Battlefield 5	76 +1420%	5−6 −1420%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 +2600%	1−2 −2600%
Far Cry 5	67 +1575%	4−5 −1575%
Far Cry New Dawn	65 +1525%	4−5 −1525%
Forza Horizon 4	77 +1440%	5−6 −1440%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +2150%	2−3 −2150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +1300%	2−3 −1300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 +1450%	2−3 −1450%
Hitman 3	30−35 +1550%	2−3 −1550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Metro Exodus	21 +2000%	1−2 −2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	26 +2500%	1−2 −2500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +1333%	3−4 −1333%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +1800%	1−2 −1800%
Battlefield 5	43 +1333%	3−4 −1333%
Cyberpunk 2077	11	0−1
Far Cry 5	35 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Far Cry New Dawn	35 +483%	6−7 −483%
Forza Horizon 4	51 +1600%	3−4 −1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and HD 6750M compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti is 1233% faster in 900p
GTX 1660 Ti is 320% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti is 1375% faster in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti is 1800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 4800% faster than the HD 6750M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 1660 Ti surpassed HD 6750M in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.41	2.42
Recency	22 February 2019	4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	35 Watt