ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking160not rated
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.20no data
Power efficiency19.16no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameTU116R360
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)4 March 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1500 MHz378 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate169.93.024
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs968

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB128 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz338 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s21.63 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2019 4 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 60 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has an age advantage of 14 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO Mac Edition, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition
Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 7832 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.