ATI Radeon HD 5670 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon HD 5670, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
32.04
+1510%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms ATI HD 5670 by a whopping 1510% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking164881
Place by popularity27not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.320.25
Power efficiency19.252.24
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameTU116Redwood
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)14 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 16828% better value for money than ATI HD 5670.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536400
Core clock speed1500 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt64 Watt
Texture fill rate169.915.50
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs9620

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 32.04
+1510%
ATI HD 5670 1.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12905
+1509%
ATI HD 5670 802

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
+1459%
ATI HD 5670 1468

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti 61217
+830%
ATI HD 5670 6584

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p400−450
+1438%
26
−1438%
Full HD103
+222%
32
−222%
1440p60
+1900%
3−4
−1900%
4K39
+1850%
2−3
−1850%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.71
+37.3%
3.72
−37.3%
1440p4.65
+753%
39.67
−753%
4K7.15
+732%
59.50
−732%
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 37% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 753% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 732% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+738%
8−9
−738%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+1200%
6−7
−1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+738%
8−9
−738%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+500%
6−7
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+1318%
10−12
−1318%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+1780%
5−6
−1780%
Metro Exodus 98
+4800%
2−3
−4800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+1388%
8−9
−1388%
Valorant 161
+1689%
9−10
−1689%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 123
+2975%
4−5
−2975%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+738%
8−9
−738%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+367%
6−7
−367%
Dota 2 140
+3400%
4−5
−3400%
Far Cry 5 118
+743%
14−16
−743%
Fortnite 134
+1118%
10−12
−1118%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+1055%
10−12
−1055%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+1700%
4−5
−1700%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+2875%
4−5
−2875%
Metro Exodus 68
+3300%
2−3
−3300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+835%
20−22
−835%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+1178%
9−10
−1178%
Valorant 82
+1540%
5−6
−1540%
World of Tanks 270−280
+595%
40−45
−595%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+1850%
4−5
−1850%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+738%
8−9
−738%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
Dota 2 168
+4100%
4−5
−4100%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+543%
14−16
−543%
Forza Horizon 4 110
+900%
10−12
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 66
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 98
+390%
20−22
−390%
Valorant 118
+1586%
7−8
−1586%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 62
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Grand Theft Auto V 62 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1057%
14−16
−1057%
Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
World of Tanks 210−220
+1554%
12−14
−1554%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+333%
3−4
−333%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+1667%
6−7
−1667%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+1850%
4−5
−1850%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Metro Exodus 65
+1525%
4−5
−1525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
Valorant 82
+925%
8−9
−925%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Dota 2 56
+250%
16−18
−250%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+273%
14−16
−273%
Metro Exodus 21
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+1667%
6−7
−1667%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+273%
14−16
−273%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 94
+488%
16−18
−488%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Forza Horizon 5 24 0−1
Valorant 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and ATI HD 5670 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 1438% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 222% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 1900% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 1850% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 4800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1660 Ti surpassed ATI HD 5670 in all 48 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.04 1.99
Recency 22 February 2019 14 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 64 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 1510.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 5670, on the other hand, has 87.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5670 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
ATI Radeon HD 5670
Radeon HD 5670

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8154 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 455 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.