HD Graphics 620 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with HD Graphics 620, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
33.38
+1279%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms HD Graphics 620 by a whopping 1279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking165851
Place by popularity2765
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.31no data
Power efficiency19.1911.13
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTU116Kaby Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 February 2019 (5 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536192
Core clock speed1500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm++
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate169.924.00
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs483
TMUs9624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.38
+1279%
HD Graphics 620 2.42

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12908
+1281%
HD Graphics 620 935

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti 22892
+1418%
HD Graphics 620 1509

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti 61217
+955%
HD Graphics 620 5803

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti 16024
+1616%
HD Graphics 620 934

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 93095
+1105%
HD Graphics 620 7725

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti 483604
+512%
HD Graphics 620 79067

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1660 Ti 90
+654%
HD Graphics 620 12

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1660 Ti 52
+95.5%
HD Graphics 620 27

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1660 Ti 8
+132%
HD Graphics 620 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1660 Ti 51
+297%
HD Graphics 620 13

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1660 Ti 40
+245%
HD Graphics 620 12

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1660 Ti 27
+585%
HD Graphics 620 4

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1660 Ti 7
+3550%
HD Graphics 620 0

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1660 Ti 123
+935%
HD Graphics 620 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD105
+650%
14
−650%
1440p60
+1400%
4−5
−1400%
4K39
+1850%
2−3
−1850%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.66no data
1440p4.65no data
4K7.15no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+1417%
6−7
−1417%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+1460%
5−6
−1460%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+1417%
6−7
−1417%
Battlefield 5 129
+1743%
7−8
−1743%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+1320%
5−6
−1320%
Far Cry 5 109
+1717%
6
−1717%
Fortnite 247
+1958%
12
−1958%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+1091%
11
−1091%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+3033%
3−4
−3033%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200
+2122%
9
−2122%
Valorant 190−200
+376%
40−45
−376%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+1417%
6−7
−1417%
Battlefield 5 112
+1500%
7−8
−1500%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+540%
43
−540%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Dota 2 181
+654%
24
−654%
Far Cry 5 99
+3200%
3−4
−3200%
Fortnite 143
+1200%
10−12
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+1009%
10−12
−1009%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+2300%
3−4
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+3867%
3
−3867%
Metro Exodus 55
+1275%
4−5
−1275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150
+1150%
12−14
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+2220%
5
−2220%
Valorant 190−200
+376%
40−45
−376%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+1357%
7−8
−1357%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+644%
9−10
−644%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+820%
5−6
−820%
Dota 2 168
+600%
24
−600%
Far Cry 5 94
+3033%
3−4
−3033%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+782%
10−12
−782%
Forza Horizon 5 66
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+975%
12−14
−975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
Valorant 118
+188%
40−45
−188%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 117
+964%
10−12
−964%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+1244%
16−18
−1244%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
Metro Exodus 33
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+929%
16−18
−929%
Valorant 230−240
+1121%
18−20
−1121%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+1420%
5−6
−1420%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Far Cry 5 67
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+1440%
5−6
−1440%
Forza Horizon 5 47
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+1275%
4−5
−1275%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75
+1775%
4−5
−1775%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+273%
14−16
−273%
Metro Exodus 21
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Valorant 180−190
+1467%
12−14
−1467%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+1333%
3−4
−1333%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Dota 2 94
+1467%
6−7
−1467%
Far Cry 5 35
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Forza Horizon 5 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+733%
3−4
−733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and HD Graphics 620 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 650% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 1400% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 1850% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti is 6100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is ahead in 58 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.38 2.42
Recency 22 February 2019 30 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 1279.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 620, on the other hand, has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 700% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while HD Graphics 620 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8225 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2804 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or HD Graphics 620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.