Quadro FX 570 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile with Quadro FX 570, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
24.82
+4179%

1660 Ti Mobile outperforms 570 by a whopping 4179% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2421243
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.350.01
Power efficiency24.981.23
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU116G84
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)12 September 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 323400% better value for money than FX 570.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153616
Core clock speed1455 MHz460 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt38 Watt
Texture fill rate152.63.680
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS0.02944 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs968
L1 Cache1.5 MBno data
L2 Cache1536 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB256 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.51.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD88
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
1440p58
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
4K350−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.60
+3724%
99.50
−3724%
1440p3.95
+4940%
199.00
−4940%
4K6.54no data
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 3724% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 4940% lower cost per frame in 1440p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 147
+4800%
3−4
−4800%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+4200%
2−3
−4200%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
+7300%
1−2
−7300%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 111
+5450%
2−3
−5450%
Counter-Strike 2 133
+4333%
3−4
−4333%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+6700%
1−2
−6700%
Far Cry 5 93
+4550%
2−3
−4550%
Fortnite 120−130
+6250%
2−3
−6250%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+4367%
3−4
−4367%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+4900%
2−3
−4900%
Hogwarts Legacy 62
+6100%
1−2
−6100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+5200%
2−3
−5200%
Valorant 209
+5125%
4−5
−5125%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 103
+5050%
2−3
−5050%
Counter-Strike 2 101
+4950%
2−3
−4950%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+4350%
6−7
−4350%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Dota 2 121
+5950%
2−3
−5950%
Far Cry 5 89
+4350%
2−3
−4350%
Fortnite 120−130
+6250%
2−3
−6250%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+6150%
2−3
−6150%
Forza Horizon 5 90
+4400%
2−3
−4400%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+5150%
2−3
−5150%
Hogwarts Legacy 48
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Metro Exodus 54
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+5200%
2−3
−5200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+5050%
2−3
−5050%
Valorant 207
+5075%
4−5
−5075%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 94
+4600%
2−3
−4600%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+5100%
1−2
−5100%
Dota 2 116
+5700%
2−3
−5700%
Far Cry 5 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+4850%
2−3
−4850%
Hogwarts Legacy 35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+5350%
2−3
−5350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Valorant 125
+6150%
2−3
−6150%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 107
+5250%
2−3
−5250%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+4600%
4−5
−4600%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+4900%
1−2
−4900%
Metro Exodus 30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+4275%
4−5
−4275%
Valorant 197
+4825%
4−5
−4825%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%
Cyberpunk 2077 25 0−1
Far Cry 5 60
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−33 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+4400%
1−2
−4400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 69
+6800%
1−2
−6800%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 19 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35 0−1
Valorant 152
+4967%
3−4
−4967%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 38 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 10 0−1
Dota 2 85
+8400%
1−2
−8400%
Far Cry 5 31 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4600%
1−2
−4600%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−33 0−1

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and FX 570 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 4300% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 5700% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.82 0.58
Recency 23 April 2019 12 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 38 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 4179.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

FX 570, on the other hand, has 110.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 570 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 570 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Quadro FX 570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 1700 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 16 votes

Rate Quadro FX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or Quadro FX 570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.