GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
28.73
+42.5%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking203281
Place by popularitynot in top-10083
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency24.7827.82
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU116TU116
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15361024
Core clock speed1455 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate152.695.04
Floating-point processing power4.884 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs9664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 28.73
+42.5%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.16

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 20119
+51.7%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 49309
+13.3%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 14818
+49.2%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 97517
+49.7%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 419800
+2.3%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 5659
+56.4%
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 3618

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
+47.5%
61
−47.5%
1440p60
+30.4%
46
−30.4%
4K38
+40.7%
27
−40.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.54no data
1440p3.82no data
4K6.03no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 109
+43.4%
76
−43.4%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+50%
42
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+45.8%
59
−45.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 81
+44.6%
56
−44.6%
Battlefield 5 111
+32.1%
84
−32.1%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+50%
36
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+47.8%
46
−47.8%
Far Cry 5 93
+38.8%
67
−38.8%
Fortnite 120−130
+6.6%
121
−6.6%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+74%
75−80
−74%
Forza Horizon 5 69
+1.5%
68
−1.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+48.6%
70−75
−48.6%
Valorant 209
+15.5%
181
−15.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50
+47.1%
34
−47.1%
Battlefield 5 103
+41.1%
73
−41.1%
Counter-Strike 2 49
+63.3%
30
−63.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+16.1%
230−240
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+50%
36
−50%
Dota 2 121
+1.7%
119
−1.7%
Far Cry 5 89
+43.5%
62
−43.5%
Fortnite 120−130
+43.3%
90
−43.3%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+62.3%
75−80
−62.3%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+33.3%
45
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+38.2%
76
−38.2%
Metro Exodus 54
+42.1%
38
−42.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+48.6%
70−75
−48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+43.1%
72
−43.1%
Valorant 207
+15%
180
−15%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 94
+40.3%
67
−40.3%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+52.8%
35−40
−52.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+52.9%
34
−52.9%
Dota 2 116
+3.6%
112
−3.6%
Far Cry 5 83
+43.1%
58
−43.1%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+28.6%
75−80
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+6.4%
47
−6.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+51.4%
70−75
−51.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+41%
39
−41%
Valorant 125
−13.6%
140−150
+13.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 107
+55.1%
69
−55.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+37.2%
130−140
−37.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+51.5%
30−35
−51.5%
Metro Exodus 30
+20%
24−27
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.3%
170−180
−2.3%
Valorant 197
+20.1%
164
−20.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+35.3%
51
−35.3%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+56.3%
16
−56.3%
Far Cry 5 60
+39.5%
40−45
−39.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+47.9%
45−50
−47.9%
Forza Horizon 5 42
+50%
28
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+48.4%
30−35
−48.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 69
+68.3%
41
−68.3%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+52.9%
30−35
−52.9%
Metro Exodus 19
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+40%
25
−40%
Valorant 152
+81%
84
−81%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+35.7%
28
−35.7%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+66.7%
6
−66.7%
Dota 2 85
+63.5%
52
−63.5%
Far Cry 5 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+45.5%
30−35
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+57.1%
14
−57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+138%
13
−138%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 48% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 30% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 41% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 138% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 14% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.73 20.16
Recency 23 April 2019 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has a 42.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 60% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1611 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1735 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.