Arc Pro B60 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Place in the ranking	246	197
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	32.09	32.79
Power efficiency	25.01	11.92
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Xe2 (2024)
GPU code name	TU116	BMG-G21
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	23 April 2019 (6 years ago)	5 September 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$229	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc Pro B60 has 2% better value for money than GTX 1660 Ti Mobile.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	2560
Core clock speed	1455 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1590 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	6,600 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	152.6	384.0
Floating-point processing power	4.884 TFLOPS	12.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	96	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20
L1 Cache	1.5 MB	no data
L2 Cache	1536 KB	4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x8
Length	no data	167 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.4
CUDA	7.5	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	88 −13.6%	100−110 +13.6%
1440p	58 −12.1%	65−70 +12.1%
4K	35 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.60 +91.8%	4.99 −91.8%
1440p	3.95 +94.4%	7.68 −94.4%
4K	6.54 +90.7%	12.48 −90.7%

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 92% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 94% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 91% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	147 −15.6%	170−180 +15.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	86 −16.3%	100−105 +16.3%
Hogwarts Legacy	74 −14.9%	85−90 +14.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	111 −17.1%	130−140 +17.1%
Counter-Strike 2	133 −12.8%	150−160 +12.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	68 −17.6%	80−85 +17.6%
Far Cry 5	93 −18.3%	110−120 +18.3%
Fortnite	120−130 −18.1%	150−160 +18.1%
Forza Horizon 4	134 −11.9%	150−160 +11.9%
Forza Horizon 5	100 −10%	110−120 +10%
Hogwarts Legacy	62 −12.9%	70−75 +12.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −13.2%	120−130 +13.2%
Valorant	209 −14.8%	240−250 +14.8%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	103 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Counter-Strike 2	101 −18.8%	120−130 +18.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	260−270 −12.4%	300−310 +12.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%
Dota 2	121 −15.7%	140−150 +15.7%
Far Cry 5	89 −12.4%	100−105 +12.4%
Fortnite	120−130 −18.1%	150−160 +18.1%
Forza Horizon 4	125 −12%	140−150 +12%
Forza Horizon 5	90 −11.1%	100−105 +11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	105 −14.3%	120−130 +14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy	48 −14.6%	55−60 +14.6%
Metro Exodus	54 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −13.2%	120−130 +13.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	103 −16.5%	120−130 +16.5%
Valorant	207 −15.9%	240−250 +15.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	94 −17%	110−120 +17%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 −15.4%	60−65 +15.4%
Dota 2	116 −12.1%	130−140 +12.1%
Far Cry 5	83 −14.5%	95−100 +14.5%
Forza Horizon 4	99 −11.1%	110−120 +11.1%
Hogwarts Legacy	35 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	109 −10.1%	120−130 +10.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55 −18.2%	65−70 +18.2%
Valorant	125 −12%	140−150 +12%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

107

−12.1%

120−130
+12.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 −18.6%	70−75 +18.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	180−190 −17%	220−230 +17%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 −10%	55−60 +10%
Metro Exodus	30 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −14.3%	200−210 +14.3%
Valorant	197 −16.8%	230−240 +16.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	69 −15.9%	80−85 +15.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −8%	27−30 +8%
Far Cry 5	60 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −14.3%	80−85 +14.3%
Hogwarts Legacy	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

−15.9%

80−85
+15.9%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 −17.6%	60−65 +17.6%
Hogwarts Legacy	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
Metro Exodus	19 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
Valorant	152 −18.4%	180−190 +18.4%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	38 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	10 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	85 −17.6%	100−105 +17.6%
Far Cry 5	31 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −17%	55−60 +17%
Hogwarts Legacy	16−18 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

30−33

−16.7%

35−40
+16.7%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and Arc Pro B60 compete in popular games:

Arc Pro B60 is 14% faster in 1080p
Arc Pro B60 is 12% faster in 1440p
Arc Pro B60 is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.82	29.58
Recency	23 April 2019	5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	200 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti Mobile has 150% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B60, on the other hand, has a 19.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc Pro B60 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro B60 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Arc Pro B60

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile

Arc Pro B60

Radeon Pro W6600X

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 1700 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

2.4 13 votes

Rate Arc Pro B60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile or Arc Pro B60, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.

Arc Pro B60 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

Contents

Primary details

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Form factor & compatibility

VRAM capacity and type

Connectivity and outputs

API and SDK support

Gaming performance

Average FPS across all PC games

Cost per frame, $

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

Vote for your favorite

Other comparisons

Community ratings

Comments