Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with Radeon RX 7900 XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
22.82

RX 7900 XT outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking22712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.0825.40
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code nameN18E-G0Navi 31 XT
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)3 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $899
Current price$1037 (4.5x MSRP)$884 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 XT has 58% better value for money than GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15365376
Core clock speed1140 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1335 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate128.2804.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and Radeon RX 7900 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB20 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.82
RX 7900 XT 74.74
+228%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
RX 7900 XT 28866
+228%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 228% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 17439
RX 7900 XT 75896
+335%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 335% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 31845
RX 7900 XT 142489
+347%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 347% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 13355
RX 7900 XT 63712
+377%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 377% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 63086
RX 7900 XT 259707
+312%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 312% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 306910
RX 7900 XT 737404
+140%

Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 140% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD81
−154%
206
+154%
1440p40−45
−245%
138
+245%
4K32
−188%
92
+188%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 88 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 92 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 130 no data
Metro Exodus 120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 92 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 84 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 77 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95 no data
Metro Exodus 86 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 78 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 42 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 no data
Far Cry 5 54 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 79 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 72 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 no data
Hitman 3 18−20 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22 no data

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is 154% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT is 245% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT is 188% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.82 74.74
Recency 23 April 2019 3 November 2022
Cost $229 $899
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 315 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 491 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1453 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.