RTX A2000 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with RTX A2000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
22.82

RTX A2000 outperforms GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking227127
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.0819.11
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN18E-G0GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 August 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $449
Current price$1037 (4.5x MSRP)$567 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A2000 has 19% better value for money than GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores15363328
Core clock speed1140 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1335 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate128.2124.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and RTX A2000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 22.82
RTX A2000 35.61
+56%

RTX A2000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q 8814
RTX A2000 13751
+56%

RTX A2000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q by 56% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD81
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%
4K32
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−60%
56
+60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−60%
88
+60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−75%
70
+75%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−67.3%
92
+67.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−68.3%
100−110
+68.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
−70.4%
45−50
+70.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−62.5%
130
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 75−80
−60%
120
+60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−67.3%
92
+67.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−71.1%
75−80
+71.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−65%
65−70
+65%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−70%
51
+70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−68%
84
+68%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−65%
66
+65%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−71.1%
77
+71.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−71.4%
60−65
+71.4%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−68.3%
100−110
+68.3%
Hitman 3 27−30
−70.4%
45−50
+70.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−56.4%
86
+56.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−73.3%
78
+73.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−71.1%
75−80
+71.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−67.3%
92
+67.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−65%
65−70
+65%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−75%
42
+75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−66.7%
50
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−76.2%
35−40
+76.2%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−80%
54
+80%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−68.3%
100−110
+68.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−58%
79
+58%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−71.1%
75−80
+71.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−70%
51
+70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−65%
65−70
+65%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−60%
72
+60%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−62.5%
35−40
+62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Hitman 3 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−59.3%
40−45
+59.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−63.3%
45−50
+63.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Hitman 3 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−72.2%
31
+72.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−72.2%
30−35
+72.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and RTX A2000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 is 48% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 is 41% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.82 35.61
Recency 23 April 2019 10 August 2021
Cost $229 $449
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX A2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is a notebook card while RTX A2000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX A2000
RTX A2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 491 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 520 votes

Rate RTX A2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.