Radeon R9 M390 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super with Radeon R9 M390, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.07
+235%

GTX 1660 Super outperforms R9 M390 by a whopping 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking148419
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.60no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameTuring TU116Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)9 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data
Current price$277 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14081024
Core clock speed1530 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1785 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million5000 Million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1660 Super and Radeon R9 M390 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinityno data1
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
Endurono data-
FreeSyncno data1
HD3Dno data+
PowerTuneno data+
DualGraphicsno data1
TrueAudiono data-
ZeroCoreno data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131no data
Mantleno data+
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.07
+235%
R9 M390 9.87

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon R9 M390 by 235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1660 Super 21982
+222%
R9 M390 6819

GeForce GTX 1660 Super outperforms Radeon R9 M390 by 222% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
+114%
42
−114%
1440p54
+238%
16−18
−238%
4K30
+50%
20
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+225%
20−22
−225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+223%
30−35
−223%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+225%
20−22
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+226%
21−24
−226%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+233%
45−50
−233%
Hitman 3 60−65
+216%
18−20
−216%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+233%
40−45
−233%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+233%
30−33
−233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+223%
30−35
−223%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+225%
20−22
−225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%
Battlefield 5 100−105
+223%
30−35
−223%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+225%
20−22
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+226%
21−24
−226%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+233%
45−50
−233%
Hitman 3 60−65
+216%
18−20
−216%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+233%
40−45
−233%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+233%
30−33
−233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+223%
30−35
−223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105
+223%
31
−223%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70
+225%
20−22
−225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+225%
20−22
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+226%
21−24
−226%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+233%
45−50
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+233%
40−45
−233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−105
+223%
30−35
−223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+233%
18
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+214%
35−40
−214%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+221%
27−30
−221%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+216%
18−20
−216%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+233%
18−20
−233%
Hitman 3 40−45
+208%
12−14
−208%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+225%
20−22
−225%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+221%
14−16
−221%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+208%
12−14
−208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+213%
16−18
−213%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Hitman 3 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+233%
12
−233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and R9 M390 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 114% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 238% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.07 9.87
Recency 29 October 2019 9 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M390 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop card while Radeon R9 M390 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17927 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.