GeForce 9800 GTX vs 1660 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super and GeForce 9800 GTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.07
+1562%

1660 Super outperforms 9800 by a whopping 1562% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking148850
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.600.08
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTuring TU116G92
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)28 March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $299
Current price$277 (1.2x MSRP)$151 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Super has 35650% better value for money than 9800 GTX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408128
CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed1530 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt140 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate157.143.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data432.1 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm10.5" (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 6-pin
SLI optionsno data+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s70.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI+Via Adapter
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+no data
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.07
+1562%
9800 GTX 1.99

1660 Super outperforms 9800 by 1562% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1660 Super 12771
+1561%
9800 GTX 769

1660 Super outperforms 9800 by 1561% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90
+1700%
5−6
−1700%
1440p54
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
4K30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1250−1300
+1545%
76
−1545%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1450−1500
+1548%
88
−1548%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1050−1100
+1491%
66
−1491%
Battlefield 5 1750−1800
+1536%
100−110
−1536%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1300−1350
+1525%
80
−1525%
Cyberpunk 2077 1000−1050
+1487%
63
−1487%
Far Cry 5 1200−1250
+1522%
70−75
−1522%
Far Cry New Dawn 2000−2050
+1553%
121
−1553%
Forza Horizon 4 2350−2400
+1532%
144
−1532%
Hitman 3 1250−1300
+1523%
77
−1523%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3050−3100
+1540%
186
−1540%
Metro Exodus 2350−2400
+1532%
144
−1532%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1300−1350
+1525%
80
−1525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2700−2750
+1556%
163
−1556%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1350−1400
+1527%
83
−1527%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1200−1250
+1544%
73
−1544%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 750−800
+1463%
48
−1463%
Battlefield 5 1750−1800
+1536%
100−110
−1536%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1150−1200
+1497%
72
−1497%
Cyberpunk 2077 850−900
+1535%
52
−1535%
Far Cry 5 1200−1250
+1522%
70−75
−1522%
Far Cry New Dawn 1400−1450
+1528%
86
−1528%
Forza Horizon 4 2200−2250
+1554%
130−140
−1554%
Hitman 3 1000−1050
+1487%
63
−1487%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4800−4850
+1555%
290
−1555%
Metro Exodus 1800−1850
+1522%
111
−1522%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1050−1100
+1541%
64
−1541%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2100−2150
+1528%
129
−1528%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1850−1900
+1537%
113
−1537%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3450−3500
+1559%
208
−1559%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 800−850
+1469%
51
−1469%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 700−750
+1491%
44
−1491%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 900−950
+1536%
55
−1536%
Cyberpunk 2077 800−850
+1533%
49
−1533%
Far Cry 5 1200−1250
+1522%
70−75
−1522%
Forza Horizon 4 1750−1800
+1536%
107
−1536%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1600−1650
+1516%
99
−1516%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1850−1900
+1552%
112
−1552%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1000−1050
+1539%
61
−1539%
Watch Dogs: Legion 500−550
+1513%
31
−1513%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 900−950
+1479%
57
−1479%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1000−1050
+1487%
60−65
−1487%
Far Cry New Dawn 1350−1400
+1546%
82
−1546%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 650−700
+1525%
40
−1525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 550−600
+1518%
34
−1518%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 850−900
+1504%
53
−1504%
Cyberpunk 2077 400−450
+1438%
26
−1438%
Far Cry 5 1050−1100
+1515%
65
−1515%
Forza Horizon 4 1350−1400
+1507%
84
−1507%
Hitman 3 700−750
+1528%
43
−1528%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1150−1200
+1520%
71
−1520%
Metro Exodus 1100−1150
+1542%
67
−1542%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1300−1350
+1525%
80
−1525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 700−750
+1456%
45−50
−1456%
Watch Dogs: Legion 350−400
+1358%
24
−1358%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 900−950
+1507%
56
−1507%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 500−550
+1415%
30−35
−1415%
Far Cry New Dawn 500−550
+1513%
31
−1513%
Hitman 3 400−450
+1500%
25
−1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 650−700
+1525%
40−45
−1525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 400−450
+1381%
27
−1381%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 650−700
+1525%
40
−1525%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 350−400
+1358%
24
−1358%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 290−300
+1511%
18
−1511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 300−310
+1479%
19
−1479%
Cyberpunk 2077 180−190
+1536%
11
−1536%
Far Cry 5 300−310
+1479%
18−20
−1479%
Forza Horizon 4 850−900
+1474%
54
−1474%
Horizon Zero Dawn 650−700
+1525%
40
−1525%
Metro Exodus 550−600
+1471%
35
−1471%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+1483%
12
−1483%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 450−500
+1507%
28
−1507%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and 9800 GTX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 1700% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 1700% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 2900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.07 1.99
Recency 29 October 2019 28 March 2008
Cost $229 $299
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 140 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 17961 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 167 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.