Radeon RX 6300 vs GeForce GTX 1650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1650
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
20.36
+34.3%

GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon RX 6300 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking255329
Place by popularity3not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.96no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data
Current price$185 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896768
Core clock speed1485 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1665 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate93.2497.92

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort2x HDMI 2.1
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 20.36
+34.3%
RX 6300 15.16

GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon RX 6300 by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 7878
+34.3%
RX 6300 5866

GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon RX 6300 by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD69
+38%
50−55
−38%
1440p37
+37%
27−30
−37%
4K24
+50%
16−18
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Battlefield 5 79
+43.6%
55−60
−43.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Far Cry 5 64
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 80
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%
Hitman 3 76
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 115
+35.3%
85−90
−35.3%
Metro Exodus 101
+34.7%
75−80
−34.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+40%
55−60
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94
+44.6%
65−70
−44.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 56
+40%
40−45
−40%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Battlefield 5 72
+44%
50−55
−44%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 63
+40%
45−50
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Far Cry 5 90
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Forza Horizon 4 83
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Hitman 3 38
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 88
+35.4%
65−70
−35.4%
Metro Exodus 62
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+40%
45−50
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Far Cry 5 39
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60
+50%
40−45
−50%
Metro Exodus 57
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+50%
14−16
−50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+35%
40−45
−35%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 50
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Hitman 3 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Far Cry 5 39
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 43
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Metro Exodus 41
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+40%
10−11
−40%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 67
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
+50%
18−20
−50%
Hitman 3 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Metro Exodus 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

This is how GTX 1650 and RX 6300 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 38% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 37% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.36 15.16
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 32 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
AMD Radeon RX 6300
Radeon RX 6300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 21026 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.