RTX A4500 vs GeForce GTX 1650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
17.80

A4500 outperforms 1650 by a whopping 168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking31969
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.83no data
Power efficiency19.1119.22
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTU117GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8967168
Core clock speed1485 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate93.24369.6
Floating-point processing power2.984 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs56224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache896 KB7 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 17.80
RTX A4500 47.75
+168%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 7872
Samples: 28169
RTX A4500 21116
+168%
Samples: 441

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1650 39118
RTX A4500 141968
+263%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1650 36039
RTX A4500 131601
+265%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1650 39941
RTX A4500 171509
+329%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
−166%
170−180
+166%
1440p38
−163%
100−110
+163%
4K24
−150%
60−65
+150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.33no data
1440p3.92no data
4K6.21no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−166%
290−300
+166%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 61
−162%
160−170
+162%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−166%
290−300
+166%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Far Cry 5 69
−161%
180−190
+161%
Fortnite 211
−161%
550−600
+161%
Forza Horizon 4 90
−167%
240−250
+167%
Forza Horizon 5 73
−160%
190−200
+160%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90
−167%
240−250
+167%
Valorant 292
−157%
750−800
+157%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 53
−164%
140−150
+164%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
−166%
290−300
+166%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−160%
600−650
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Dota 2 97
−168%
260−270
+168%
Far Cry 5 63
−154%
160−170
+154%
Fortnite 85
−159%
220−230
+159%
Forza Horizon 4 83
−165%
220−230
+165%
Forza Horizon 5 62
−158%
160−170
+158%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
−159%
210−220
+159%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
Metro Exodus 35
−157%
90−95
+157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 86
−167%
230−240
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−168%
190−200
+168%
Valorant 260
−150%
650−700
+150%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 51
−155%
130−140
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Dota 2 92
−161%
240−250
+161%
Far Cry 5 59
−154%
150−160
+154%
Forza Horizon 4 65
−162%
170−180
+162%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
−157%
95−100
+157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 66
−158%
170−180
+158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−144%
100−105
+144%
Valorant 70
−157%
180−190
+157%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 61
−162%
160−170
+162%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−152%
350−400
+152%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
−150%
100−105
+150%
Metro Exodus 20
−150%
50−55
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−163%
450−500
+163%
Valorant 177
−154%
450−500
+154%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 39
−156%
100−105
+156%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Far Cry 5 40
−150%
100−105
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 46
−161%
120−130
+161%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−158%
80−85
+158%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 42
−162%
110−120
+162%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
−158%
85−90
+158%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Metro Exodus 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−150%
65−70
+150%
Valorant 83
−165%
220−230
+165%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21
−162%
55−60
+162%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Dota 2 59
−154%
150−160
+154%
Far Cry 5 19
−163%
50−55
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−167%
80−85
+167%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−150%
65−70
+150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 11
−145%
27−30
+145%

This is how GTX 1650 and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 166% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 is 163% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.80 47.75
Recency 23 April 2019 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 200 Watt

GTX 1650 has 166.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 168.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 26856 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 210 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.