RTX A2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile with RTX A2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Mobile
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
18.47

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking309220
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Power efficiency25.3418.50
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 April 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speed1380 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1358 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate99.84108.6
Floating-point processing power3.195 TFLOPS6.953 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs6480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.47
RTX A2000 Mobile 25.61
+38.7%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
RTX A2000 Mobile 9869
+38.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 Mobile 13132
RTX A2000 Mobile 18058
+37.5%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 Mobile 31311
RTX A2000 Mobile 63738
+104%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Mobile 9313
RTX A2000 Mobile 13157
+41.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Mobile 57365
RTX A2000 Mobile 60336
+5.2%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1650 Mobile 3488
RTX A2000 Mobile 5016
+43.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−33.9%
79
+33.9%
1440p37
−13.5%
42
+13.5%
4K24
−54.2%
37
+54.2%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
Atomic Heart 69
+4.5%
65−70
−4.5%
Counter-Strike 2 38
−23.7%
45−50
+23.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
−42.3%
74
+42.3%
Atomic Heart 51
−29.4%
65−70
+29.4%
Battlefield 5 60
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 33
−42.4%
45−50
+42.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
−51.2%
62
+51.2%
Far Cry 5 60
−60%
96
+60%
Fortnite 90−95
−26.6%
110−120
+26.6%
Forza Horizon 4 82
−17.1%
95−100
+17.1%
Forza Horizon 5 60
−13.3%
65−70
+13.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−44.6%
90−95
+44.6%
Valorant 164
−0.6%
160−170
+0.6%
Atomic Heart 30
−120%
65−70
+120%
Battlefield 5 60
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Counter-Strike 2 27
−74.1%
45−50
+74.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130
−97.7%
250−260
+97.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
−56.3%
50
+56.3%
Dota 2 96
−51%
145
+51%
Far Cry 5 54
−63%
88
+63%
Fortnite 90−95
−26.6%
110−120
+26.6%
Forza Horizon 4 80
−20%
95−100
+20%
Forza Horizon 5 34
−100%
65−70
+100%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
−79.7%
106
+79.7%
Metro Exodus 33
−33.3%
44
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−44.6%
90−95
+44.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−54.8%
96
+54.8%
Valorant 148
−11.5%
160−170
+11.5%
Battlefield 5 59
−61%
95−100
+61%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−46.9%
45−50
+46.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−36.7%
41
+36.7%
Dota 2 89
−44.9%
129
+44.9%
Far Cry 5 53
−56.6%
83
+56.6%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−54.8%
95−100
+54.8%
Forza Horizon 5 39
−74.4%
65−70
+74.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
−32.4%
90−95
+32.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−38.9%
50
+38.9%
Valorant 130−140
−23.1%
160−170
+23.1%
Fortnite 72
−65.3%
110−120
+65.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−33.1%
160−170
+33.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−72.4%
50
+72.4%
Metro Exodus 20
−35%
27
+35%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−5.4%
170−180
+5.4%
Valorant 159
−28.9%
200−210
+28.9%
Battlefield 5 47
−42.6%
65−70
+42.6%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
−66.7%
25
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 35
−51.4%
53
+51.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−44.2%
60−65
+44.2%
Forza Horizon 5 23
−87%
40−45
+87%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Fortnite 44
−29.5%
55−60
+29.5%
Atomic Heart 14−16
−35.7%
18−20
+35.7%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−41.9%
44
+41.9%
Metro Exodus 12
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
−57.1%
33
+57.1%
Valorant 90
−55.6%
140−150
+55.6%
Battlefield 5 25
−48%
35−40
+48%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−100%
10−11
+100%
Dota 2 45
−60%
72
+60%
Far Cry 5 18
−44.4%
26
+44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%
Forza Horizon 5 13
−76.9%
21−24
+76.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
Fortnite 16−18
−52.9%
24−27
+52.9%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 34% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 14% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is 54% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 5% faster.
  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 120% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 65 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.47 25.61
Recency 15 April 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 95 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has 90% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 38.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4
3426 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8
101 vote

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile or RTX A2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.