GeForce Go 6800 vs GTX 1650 Mobile

Place in the ranking	304	1348
Place by popularity	68	not in top-100
Power efficiency	25.49	0.43
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	TU117	NV41
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 April 2020 (4 years ago)	8 November 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	17
Core clock speed	1380 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	190 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	99.84	3.600
Floating-point processing power	3.195 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	8
TMUs	64	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-III
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	550 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.0 GB/s	35.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.5	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.140	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 17.81
+6496%

Go 6800 0.27

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
+6613%

Go 6800 106

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	59	0−1
1440p	36	0−1
4K	23	-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	38 +322%	9−10 −322%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 +1633%	3−4 −1633%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	66 +6500%	1−2 −6500%
Counter-Strike 2	33 +267%	9−10 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	35 +1067%	3−4 −1067%
Forza Horizon 4	79 +1480%	5−6 −1480%
Forza Horizon 5	60	0−1
Metro Exodus	55	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	71 +1675%	4−5 −1675%
Valorant	83 +8200%	1−2 −8200%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	72 +7100%	1−2 −7100%
Counter-Strike 2	27 +200%	9−10 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +833%	3−4 −833%
Dota 2	72 +7100%	1−2 −7100%
Far Cry 5	62 +933%	6−7 −933%
Fortnite	95−100 +9800%	1−2 −9800%
Forza Horizon 4	64 +1180%	5−6 −1180%
Forza Horizon 5	34	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	59	0−1
Metro Exodus	40	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	165 +2650%	6−7 −2650%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +575%	4−5 −575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +1350%	4−5 −1350%
Valorant	47	0−1
World of Tanks	130 +983%	12−14 −983%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	56	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +267%	9−10 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +733%	3−4 −733%
Dota 2	89 +8800%	1−2 −8800%
Far Cry 5	73 +1117%	6−7 −1117%
Forza Horizon 4	55 +1000%	5−6 −1000%
Forza Horizon 5	39	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +2017%	6−7 −2017%
Valorant	75−80 +7400%	1−2 −7400%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	27−30	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +8250%	2−3 −8250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18	0−1
World of Tanks	120−130 +12600%	1−2 −12600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	37	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	16−18	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +400%	3−4 −400%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +1125%	4−5 −1125%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	23	0−1
Metro Exodus	39	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%
Valorant	45−50 +1075%	4−5 −1075%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Dota 2	30−35 +107%	14−16 −107%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 +107%	14−16 −107%
Metro Exodus	12	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	47 +4600%	1−2 −4600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +107%	14−16 −107%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	17	0−1
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +200%	2−3 −200%
Dota 2	45 +200%	14−16 −200%
Far Cry 5	24−27	0−1
Fortnite	23	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	27−30	0−1
Forza Horizon 5	13	0−1
Valorant	21−24	0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 8250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 1650 Mobile surpassed Go 6800 in all 32 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.81	0.27
Recency	15 April 2020	8 November 2004
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	45 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has a 6496.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

Go 6800, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.