A100 SXM4 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking268not rated
Place by popularity69not in top-100
Power efficiency27.98no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU116GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2020 (4 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10246912
Core clock speed1350 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate95.04609.1
Floating-point processing power3.041 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs32160
TMUs64432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount4 GB40 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2.140
CUDA7.58.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 400 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 700% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1611 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.