Matrox Millennium G200 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking206not rated
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency18.31no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)G200 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameTU116Eclipse
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 November 2019 (4 years ago)1998 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280no data
Core clock speed1530 MHz84 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate138.00.08
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs801

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length229 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SGR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s1.144 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)5.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 350 nm

GTX 1650 SUPER has a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Matrox Millennium G200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Matrox Millennium G200
Millennium G200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4685 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.