RTX A4500 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
VS
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB RTX A4000 Max-Q RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4500 Embedded RTX A4500 Max-Q RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A5000 Max-Q RTX A5000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
15.78

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms GTX 1650 Max-Q by a whopping 179% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Max-Q
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency36.9422.07
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10245888
Core clock speed930 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate72.00276.0
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs64184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1751 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 15.78
RTX A4500 Mobile 44.00
+179%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 6210
RTX A4500 Mobile 17315
+179%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
−167%
160−170
+167%
1440p30
−167%
80−85
+167%
4K18
−178%
50−55
+178%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
−226%
120−130
+226%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−263%
95−100
+263%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
−226%
120−130
+226%
Battlefield 5 64
−116%
130−140
+116%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−263%
95−100
+263%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Far Cry 5 38
−237%
120−130
+237%
Fortnite 138
−29.7%
170−180
+29.7%
Forza Horizon 4 74
−116%
160−170
+116%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85
−89.4%
160−170
+89.4%
Valorant 120−130
−93.5%
230−240
+93.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 35−40
−226%
120−130
+226%
Battlefield 5 54
−156%
130−140
+156%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−263%
95−100
+263%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 167
−66.5%
270−280
+66.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Dota 2 94
−56.4%
140−150
+56.4%
Far Cry 5 35
−266%
120−130
+266%
Fortnite 80
−124%
170−180
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 69
−132%
160−170
+132%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
−139%
130−140
+139%
Metro Exodus 28
−257%
100−105
+257%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71
−127%
160−170
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−183%
150−160
+183%
Valorant 120−130
−93.5%
230−240
+93.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 49
−182%
130−140
+182%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−263%
95−100
+263%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−206%
95−100
+206%
Dota 2 88
−67%
140−150
+67%
Far Cry 5 33
−288%
120−130
+288%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−191%
160−170
+191%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−168%
110−120
+168%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
−204%
160−170
+204%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−400%
150−160
+400%
Valorant 120−130
−93.5%
230−240
+93.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 59
−203%
170−180
+203%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−155%
280−290
+155%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−240%
85−90
+240%
Metro Exodus 16
−288%
60−65
+288%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−17.4%
170−180
+17.4%
Valorant 150−160
−73.4%
260−270
+73.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 36
−192%
100−110
+192%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−206%
100−110
+206%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−227%
120−130
+227%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−238%
80−85
+238%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 36
−211%
110−120
+211%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
−183%
30−35
+183%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
−232%
90−95
+232%
Metro Exodus 10
−280%
35−40
+280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−272%
65−70
+272%
Valorant 80−85
−204%
250−260
+204%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 19
−253%
65−70
+253%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−283%
21−24
+283%
Dota 2 50−55
−115%
110−120
+115%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−250%
55−60
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−212%
80−85
+212%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
−247%
55−60
+247%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 11
−409%
55−60
+409%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how GTX 1650 Max-Q and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 167% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 167% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 178% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 4K resolution and the Epic Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 409% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 63 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 15.78 44.00
Recency 23 April 2019 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 140 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 178.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile
vs
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
MX570 A GeForce MX570 A
R7 M445 R7 M445
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
T500 Max-Q T500 Max Q
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Mobile
Arc Pro A30M Arc Pro A30M
vs
RTX 2080 Mobile RTX 2080 Mobile
UHD Graphics 48EU UHD Graphics 48EU
vs
GeForce MX230 MX230
GTX 780 GTX 780
vs
Radeon VII VII
GTX 770 GTX 770
vs
P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
RX 6600 RX 6600
vs
Radeon 550 550
H3C XG310 H3C XG310
vs
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 670 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q or RTX A4500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.