Iris Plus Graphics G5 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking314not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.28no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake)
GPU code nameN18P-G0 / N18P-G61no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)no data
Current price$1185 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102448
Core clock speed1020 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1245 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate72.00no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and Iris Plus Graphics G5 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed8000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (FL 12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.140no data
CUDA7.5no data

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and Iris Plus Graphics G5 (Ice Lake 48 EU). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G5 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G5 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 572 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 6 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G5 (Ice Lake 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.