FirePro M8900 vs GeForce GTX 1080

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	94	not rated
Place by popularity	58	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	26.83	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Pascal GP104	Blackcomb XT
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	6 May 2016 (8 years ago)	12 April 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data
Current price	$241 (0.4x MSRP)	$267

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	960
CUDA cores	2560	no data
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	680 MHz
Boost clock speed	1733 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	277.3	32.64
Floating-point performance	8,873 gflops	1,305.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1080 and FirePro M8900 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	n/a
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	10.5" (26.7 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Form factor	no data	MXM-B
Recommended system power (PSU)	500 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin	None
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	10 GB/s	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	115 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	6 May 2016	12 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	180 Watt	75 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---