Tesla M10 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Place in the ranking	68	510
Place by popularity	44	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	20.58	no data
Power efficiency	13.33	2.53
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	GP102	GM107
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	10 March 2017 (7 years ago)	18 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	640
Core clock speed	1481 MHz	1033 MHz
Boost clock speed	1582 MHz	1306 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	225 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	91 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	354.4	52.24
Floating-point processing power	11.34 TFLOPS	1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs	88	16
TMUs	224	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	352 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1376 MHz	1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth	484.4 GB/s	83.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	+	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 48.30
+485%

Tesla M10 8.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18572
+486%

Tesla M10 3171

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1080 Ti 55161
+371%

Tesla M10 11721

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	131 +524%	21−24 −524%
1440p	83 +493%	14−16 −493%
4K	70 +600%	10−12 −600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.34	no data
1440p	8.42	no data
4K	9.99	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +494%	18−20 −494%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +489%	18−20 −489%
Elden Ring	170−180 +548%	27−30 −548%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	82 +486%	14−16 −486%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +494%	18−20 −494%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +489%	18−20 −489%
Forza Horizon 4	247 +518%	40−45 −518%
Metro Exodus	104 +550%	16−18 −550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +550%	14−16 −550%
Valorant	200−210 +567%	30−33 −567%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	149 +521%	24−27 −521%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 +494%	18−20 −494%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +489%	18−20 −489%
Dota 2	124 +490%	21−24 −490%
Elden Ring	170−180 +548%	27−30 −548%
Far Cry 5	86 +514%	14−16 −514%
Fortnite	190−200 +560%	30−33 −560%
Forza Horizon 4	196 +553%	30−33 −553%
Grand Theft Auto V	120 +567%	18−20 −567%
Metro Exodus	86 +514%	14−16 −514%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	229 +554%	35−40 −554%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65 +550%	10−11 −550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85 +507%	14−16 −507%
Valorant	123 +486%	21−24 −486%
World of Tanks	270−280 +520%	45−50 −520%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 +517%	12−14 −517%
Counter-Strike 2	60 +500%	10−11 −500%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +600%	4−5 −600%
Dota 2	125 +495%	21−24 −495%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +494%	18−20 −494%
Forza Horizon 4	167 +519%	27−30 −519%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	109 +506%	18−20 −506%
Valorant	179 +497%	30−33 −497%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	84 +500%	14−16 −500%
Elden Ring	100−110 +494%	18−20 −494%
Grand Theft Auto V	84 +500%	14−16 −500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +548%	27−30 −548%
Red Dead Redemption 2	41 +486%	7−8 −486%
World of Tanks	300−350 +514%	50−55 −514%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	72 +500%	12−14 −500%
Counter-Strike 2	37 +517%	6−7 −517%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +500%	3−4 −500%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +533%	24−27 −533%
Forza Horizon 4	123 +486%	21−24 −486%
Metro Exodus	88 +529%	14−16 −529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +557%	14−16 −557%
Valorant	131 +524%	21−24 −524%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +489%	9−10 −489%
Dota 2	98 +513%	16−18 −513%
Elden Ring	50−55 +489%	9−10 −489%
Grand Theft Auto V	98 +513%	16−18 −513%
Metro Exodus	35 +600%	5−6 −600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	132 +529%	21−24 −529%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +575%	4−5 −575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 +513%	16−18 −513%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +550%	8−9 −550%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +489%	9−10 −489%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +700%	1−2 −700%
Dota 2	125 +495%	21−24 −495%
Far Cry 5	77 +542%	12−14 −542%
Fortnite	65 +550%	10−11 −550%
Forza Horizon 4	72 +500%	12−14 −500%
Valorant	68 +580%	10−11 −580%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and Tesla M10 compete in popular games:

GTX 1080 Ti is 524% faster in 1080p
GTX 1080 Ti is 493% faster in 1440p
GTX 1080 Ti is 600% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	48.30	8.25
Recency	10 March 2017	18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	225 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 485.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 37.5% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla M10, on the other hand, has 11.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M10 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while Tesla M10 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.