ATI Radeon 9600 PRO vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon 9600 PRO, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
48.30
+43809%

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms ATI 9600 PRO by a whopping 43809% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking681446
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.59no data
Power efficiency13.300.42
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGP102RV350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584no data
Core clock speed1481 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt18 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.41.600
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPSno data
ROPs884
TMUs2244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XDDR
Maximum RAM amount11 GB128 MB
Memory bus width352 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 48.30
+43809%
ATI 9600 PRO 0.11

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18572
+44119%
ATI 9600 PRO 42

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD131-0−1
1440p83-0−1
4K70-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.34no data
1440p8.42no data
4K9.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 0−1
Elden Ring 170−180 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 82 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 247 0−1
Metro Exodus 104 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 0−1
Valorant 200−210 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 149 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110 0−1
Dota 2 124 0−1
Elden Ring 170−180 0−1
Far Cry 5 86 0−1
Fortnite 190−200 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 196 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 120 0−1
Metro Exodus 86 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 229 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 65 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85 0−1
Valorant 123 0−1
World of Tanks 270−280 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 60 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 28 0−1
Dota 2 125 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 167 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109 0−1
Valorant 179 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 84 0−1
Elden Ring 100−110 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 84 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 41 0−1
World of Tanks 300−350 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 37 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18 0−1
Far Cry 5 150−160 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 123 0−1
Metro Exodus 88 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95 0−1
Valorant 131 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 0−1
Dota 2 98 0−1
Elden Ring 50−55 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 98 0−1
Metro Exodus 35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 132 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 27 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8 0−1
Dota 2 125 0−1
Far Cry 5 77 0−1
Fortnite 65 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 72 0−1
Valorant 68 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.30 0.11
Recency 10 March 2017 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 18 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 43809.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 8700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600 PRO, on the other hand, has 1288.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 PRO in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
ATI Radeon 9600 PRO
Radeon 9600 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10330 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 72 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.