Radeon 630 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with Radeon 630, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
46.50
+1130%

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms 630 by a whopping 1130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking69705
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.50no data
Power efficiency13.315.41
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP102Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 March 2017 (7 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584512
Core clock speed1481 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1218 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.438.98
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs8816
TMUs22432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount11 GB2 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 46.50
+1130%
Radeon 630 3.78

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18581
+1129%
Radeon 630 1512

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD131
+1210%
10−12
−1210%
1440p84
+1300%
6−7
−1300%
4K70
+1300%
5−6
−1300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.34no data
1440p8.32no data
4K9.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+792%
12−14
−792%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1078%
9−10
−1078%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 82
+645%
10−12
−645%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+792%
12−14
−792%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1078%
9−10
−1078%
Forza Horizon 4 247
+1353%
16−18
−1353%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+1933%
6−7
−1933%
Metro Exodus 104
+1056%
9−10
−1056%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+600%
12−14
−600%
Valorant 200−210
+2122%
9−10
−2122%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 149
+1255%
10−12
−1255%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+792%
12−14
−792%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+1078%
9−10
−1078%
Dota 2 124
+933%
12−14
−933%
Far Cry 5 86
+330%
20−22
−330%
Fortnite 190−200
+761%
21−24
−761%
Forza Horizon 4 196
+1053%
16−18
−1053%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+1933%
6−7
−1933%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+900%
12−14
−900%
Metro Exodus 86
+856%
9−10
−856%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 229
+574%
30−35
−574%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65
+400%
12−14
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+554%
12−14
−554%
Valorant 123
+1267%
9−10
−1267%
World of Tanks 270−280
+316%
65−70
−316%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 74
+573%
10−12
−573%
Counter-Strike 2 60
+400%
12−14
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Dota 2 125
+942%
12−14
−942%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+435%
20−22
−435%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+882%
16−18
−882%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+1933%
6−7
−1933%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 109
+221%
30−35
−221%
Valorant 179
+1889%
9−10
−1889%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Dota 2 84
+2700%
3−4
−2700%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+2700%
3−4
−2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+548%
27−30
−548%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
World of Tanks 300−350
+1000%
27−30
−1000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+1340%
5−6
−1340%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+350%
4−5
−350%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+1589%
9−10
−1589%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+2360%
5−6
−2360%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+1560%
5−6
−1560%
Metro Exodus 88 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+1214%
7−8
−1214%
Valorant 131
+1091%
10−12
−1091%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%
Dota 2 98
+513%
16−18
−513%
Grand Theft Auto V 98
+513%
16−18
−513%
Metro Exodus 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 132
+1100%
10−12
−1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
+513%
16−18
−513%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Counter-Strike 2 8
−25%
10−11
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+300%
2−3
−300%
Dota 2 125
+681%
16−18
−681%
Far Cry 5 77
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
Fortnite 65
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Valorant 68
+1600%
4−5
−1600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and Radeon 630 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 1210% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 1300% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 1300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 3500% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 630 is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is ahead in 60 tests (97%)
  • Radeon 630 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 46.50 3.78
Recency 10 March 2017 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 1130.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 450% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Radeon 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon 630 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 10451 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 33 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.