ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with Mobility Radeon HD 3650, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1080 Ti outperforms ATI Mobility HD 3650 by a whopping 13297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 72 | 1298 |
| Place by popularity | 38 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 20.31 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.23 | 0.82 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | GP102 | M86 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 10 March 2017 (7 years ago) | 7 January 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3584 | 120 |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 11,800 million | 378 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 354.4 | 4.000 |
| Floating-point processing power | 11.34 TFLOPS | 0.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 88 | 4 |
| TMUs | 224 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 352 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1376 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB/s | 22.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| GPU Boost | 3.0 | no data |
| Ansel | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 130 | 0−1 |
| 1440p | 86 | 0−1 |
| 4K | 68 | 0−1 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 5.38 | no data |
| 1440p | 8.13 | no data |
| 4K | 10.28 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 130−140
+13600%
|
1−2
−13600%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+1429%
|
7−8
−1429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+10500%
|
1−2
−10500%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 130−140
+13600%
|
1−2
−13600%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 166
+16500%
|
1−2
−16500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+1429%
|
7−8
−1429%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+10500%
|
1−2
−10500%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 120 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 190−200
+19000%
|
1−2
−19000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 147
+4800%
|
3−4
−4800%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 125
+1686%
|
7−8
−1686%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+830%
|
27−30
−830%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 130−140
+13600%
|
1−2
−13600%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 154
+15300%
|
1−2
−15300%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+1429%
|
7−8
−1429%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+1886%
|
14−16
−1886%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+10500%
|
1−2
−10500%
|
| Dota 2 | 133
+1230%
|
10−11
−1230%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 117 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 203
+20200%
|
1−2
−20200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 145
+4733%
|
3−4
−4733%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 120 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 90 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 115
+1543%
|
7−8
−1543%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 160−170
+4025%
|
4−5
−4025%
|
| Valorant | 250−260
+830%
|
27−30
−830%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 149
+14800%
|
1−2
−14800%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60
+757%
|
7−8
−757%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+10500%
|
1−2
−10500%
|
| Dota 2 | 125
+1150%
|
10−11
−1150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 109 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120
+3900%
|
3−4
−3900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 102
+1357%
|
7−8
−1357%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 98
+2350%
|
4−5
−2350%
|
| Valorant | 179
+563%
|
27−30
−563%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 163
+16200%
|
1−2
−16200%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 300−350
+15350%
|
2−3
−15350%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 84 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 56 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+8650%
|
2−3
−8650%
|
| Valorant | 280−290
+13900%
|
2−3
−13900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 118 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 97 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 102
+10100%
|
1−2
−10100%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 85−90
+8800%
|
1−2
−8800%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 107 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 98
+553%
|
14−16
−553%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 72 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 260−270
+13300%
|
2−3
−13300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 70 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 125 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 55
+5400%
|
1−2
−5400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45
+2150%
|
2−3
−2150%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 51
+2450%
|
2−3
−2450%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 13600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 1080 Ti surpassed ATI Mobility HD 3650 in all 33 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 48.23 | 0.36 |
| Recency | 10 March 2017 | 7 January 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 30 Watt |
GTX 1080 Ti has a 13297.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 2100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.
ATI Mobility HD 3650, on the other hand, has 733.3% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3650 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 3650 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
