Quadro M2200 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile with Quadro M2200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
28.51
+158%

GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms M2200 by a whopping 158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking193420
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.65no data
Power efficiency16.9714.34
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP104BGM206
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)11 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$389.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201024
Core clock speed1506 MHz695 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1036 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate210.666.30
Floating-point processing power6.738 TFLOPS2.122 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s1377 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s88 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Display Portno data1.2
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Mobile 28.51
+158%
Quadro M2200 11.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Mobile 11000
+158%
Quadro M2200 4262

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 Mobile 22576
+206%
Quadro M2200 7372

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1070 Mobile 34389
+39.7%
Quadro M2200 24622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 Mobile 17237
+195%
Quadro M2200 5850

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Mobile 101041
+167%
Quadro M2200 37796

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Mobile 338057
+16.9%
Quadro M2200 289176

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1070 Mobile 5485
+218%
Quadro M2200 1724

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1070 Mobile 78
+66.5%
Quadro M2200 47

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1070 Mobile 51
Quadro M2200 86
+70%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
Quadro M2200 58
+675%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1070 Mobile 72
+0.4%
Quadro M2200 72

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 47
Quadro M2200 69
+45.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 40
+61.8%
Quadro M2200 25

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 81
+146%
Quadro M2200 33

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
+59.6%
Quadro M2200 5

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 1070 Mobile 81
+146%
Quadro M2200 33

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1070 Mobile 78
+66.5%
Quadro M2200 47

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GTX 1070 Mobile 72
+0.6%
Quadro M2200 72

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GTX 1070 Mobile 51
Quadro M2200 86
+70%

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
Quadro M2200 58
+675%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GTX 1070 Mobile 47
Quadro M2200 69
+45.7%

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GTX 1070 Mobile 40
+61.8%
Quadro M2200 25

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GTX 1070 Mobile 8.3
+59.6%
Quadro M2200 5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+130%
43
−130%
1440p57
+171%
21−24
−171%
4K43
+207%
14
−207%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+176%
16−18
−176%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75
+188%
24−27
−188%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+306%
16−18
−306%
Battlefield 5 111
+217%
35−40
−217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80
+264%
21−24
−264%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+176%
16−18
−176%
Far Cry 5 93
+258%
24−27
−258%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+226%
30−35
−226%
Forza Horizon 4 241
+230%
70−75
−230%
Hitman 3 76
+262%
21−24
−262%
Horizon Zero Dawn 166
+181%
55−60
−181%
Metro Exodus 111
+208%
35−40
−208%
Red Dead Redemption 2 86
+177%
30−35
−177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 137
+281%
35−40
−281%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150
+127%
65−70
−127%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 115
+342%
24−27
−342%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+241%
16−18
−241%
Battlefield 5 99
+183%
35−40
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74
+236%
21−24
−236%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+176%
16−18
−176%
Far Cry 5 77
+196%
24−27
−196%
Far Cry New Dawn 80
+158%
30−35
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+204%
70−75
−204%
Hitman 3 75
+257%
21−24
−257%
Horizon Zero Dawn 156
+164%
55−60
−164%
Metro Exodus 97
+169%
35−40
−169%
Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+161%
30−35
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+172%
35−40
−172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+290%
27−30
−290%
Watch Dogs: Legion 149
+126%
65−70
−126%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+115%
24−27
−115%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+194%
16−18
−194%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 56
+155%
21−24
−155%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+176%
16−18
−176%
Far Cry 5 65
+150%
24−27
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+32.9%
70−75
−32.9%
Hitman 3 65
+210%
21−24
−210%
Horizon Zero Dawn 99
+67.8%
55−60
−67.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+172%
35−40
−172%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+200%
20
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
−57.1%
65−70
+57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+148%
30−35
−148%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 64
+205%
21−24
−205%
Far Cry New Dawn 53
+212%
16−18
−212%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+264%
10−12
−264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+429%
7−8
−429%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41
+273%
10−12
−273%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+280%
5−6
−280%
Far Cry 5 42
+223%
12−14
−223%
Forza Horizon 4 181
+255%
50−55
−255%
Hitman 3 42
+200%
14−16
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 71
+209%
21−24
−209%
Metro Exodus 62
+265%
16−18
−265%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+300%
16−18
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+236%
10−12
−236%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140
+103%
65−70
−103%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+228%
18−20
−228%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+210%
10−11
−210%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
Hitman 3 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+48%
50−55
−48%
Metro Exodus 34
+278%
9−10
−278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+200%
13
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+300%
6−7
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 21
+250%
6−7
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+271%
14−16
−271%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
+300%
4−5
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+200%
10−11
−200%

This is how GTX 1070 Mobile and Quadro M2200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 130% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 171% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 207% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1070 Mobile is 700% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro M2200 is 57% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • Quadro M2200 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.51 11.04
Recency 15 August 2016 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 1070 Mobile has a 158.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M2200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 118.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 835 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 366 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.