RTX A4500 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with RTX A4500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Ti
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
38.01

RTX A4500 outperforms GTX 1070 Ti by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12549
Place by popularity70not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.43no data
Power efficiency14.5719.20
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 November 2017 (7 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24327168
Core clock speed1607 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate255.8369.6
Floating-point processing power8.186 TFLOPS23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs152224
Tensor Coresno data224
Ray Tracing Coresno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s640.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 Ti 38.01
RTX A4500 55.65
+46.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Ti 14697
RTX A4500 21516
+46.4%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1070 Ti 55390
RTX A4500 142066
+156%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1070 Ti 61154
RTX A4500 130726
+114%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1070 Ti 49727
RTX A4500 171509
+245%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
−42.9%
160−170
+42.9%
1440p72
−38.9%
100−110
+38.9%
4K54
−38.9%
75−80
+38.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.56no data
1440p5.54no data
4K7.39no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
−42.9%
150−160
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
−42.9%
150−160
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−44%
180−190
+44%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%
Far Cry 5 114
−40.4%
160−170
+40.4%
Fortnite 150−160
−41%
220−230
+41%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−46%
200−210
+46%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−44.2%
150−160
+44.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−41.8%
200−210
+41.8%
Valorant 210−220
−41.5%
300−310
+41.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
−42.9%
150−160
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 120−130
−44%
180−190
+44%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−44.4%
400−450
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%
Dota 2 127
−41.7%
180−190
+41.7%
Far Cry 5 108
−38.9%
150−160
+38.9%
Fortnite 150−160
−41%
220−230
+41%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
−46%
200−210
+46%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−44.2%
150−160
+44.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
−41.7%
170−180
+41.7%
Metro Exodus 66
−43.9%
95−100
+43.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−41.8%
200−210
+41.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−40.5%
170−180
+40.5%
Valorant 210−220
−41.5%
300−310
+41.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 111
−44.1%
160−170
+44.1%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
−39.2%
110−120
+39.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%
Dota 2 121
−40.5%
170−180
+40.5%
Far Cry 5 102
−37.3%
140−150
+37.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100
−40%
140−150
+40%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−44.2%
150−160
+44.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−41.8%
200−210
+41.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−38.9%
100−105
+38.9%
Valorant 210−220
−41.5%
300−310
+41.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 109
−37.6%
150−160
+37.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
−44%
350−400
+44%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Metro Exodus 40
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−42.9%
250−260
+42.9%
Valorant 240−250
−42.3%
350−400
+42.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
−44.6%
120−130
+44.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
Far Cry 5 75
−33.3%
100−105
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 81
−35.8%
110−120
+35.8%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−42.9%
90−95
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−46.2%
95−100
+46.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
−38.9%
100−105
+38.9%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
−37.9%
40−45
+37.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
−41.8%
95−100
+41.8%
Metro Exodus 25
−40%
35−40
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−38.3%
65−70
+38.3%
Valorant 210−220
−39.5%
300−310
+39.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
−38.3%
65−70
+38.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Dota 2 105
−42.9%
150−160
+42.9%
Far Cry 5 39
−41%
55−60
+41%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%

This is how GTX 1070 Ti and RTX A4500 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 is 43% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 is 39% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 is 39% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.01 55.65
Recency 2 November 2017 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 200 Watt

GTX 1070 Ti has 11.1% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 46.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a desktop card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
NVIDIA RTX A4500
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3983 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 198 votes

Rate RTX A4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 Ti or RTX A4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.