Quadro P2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with Quadro P2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Ti
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
36.89
+143%

GTX 1070 Ti outperforms P2000 Mobile by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking125351
Place by popularity70not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.74no data
Power efficiency14.6514.44
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2 November 2017 (7 years ago)15 February 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24321152
Core clock speed1607 MHz1291 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1291 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate255.892.95
Floating-point processing power8.186 TFLOPS2.974 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs15272

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3.75 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Ti 36.89
+143%
P2000 Mobile 15.16

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 Ti 27503
+228%
P2000 Mobile 8387

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 Ti 18405
+169%
P2000 Mobile 6847

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Ti 88161
+102%
P2000 Mobile 43566

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Ti 442105
+26.2%
P2000 Mobile 350317

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD109
+173%
40−45
−173%
1440p71
+163%
27−30
−163%
4K55
+162%
21−24
−162%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.66no data
1440p5.62no data
4K7.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+145%
75−80
−145%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+145%
40−45
−145%
Metro Exodus 107
+168%
40−45
−168%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
Valorant 150−160
+153%
60−65
−153%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Dota 2 42
+163%
16−18
−163%
Far Cry 5 75
+150%
30−33
−150%
Fortnite 160−170
+158%
65−70
−158%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+145%
75−80
−145%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+145%
40−45
−145%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+167%
45−50
−167%
Metro Exodus 78
+160%
30−33
−160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 112
+149%
45−50
−149%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+145%
55−60
−145%
Valorant 150−160
+153%
60−65
−153%
World of Tanks 270−280
+154%
110−120
−154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+158%
40−45
−158%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Dota 2 121
+169%
45−50
−169%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+177%
35−40
−177%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+145%
75−80
−145%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+145%
40−45
−145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+148%
80−85
−148%
Valorant 150−160
+153%
60−65
−153%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Dota 2 70−75
+159%
27−30
−159%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+163%
27−30
−163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+150%
70−75
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
World of Tanks 240−250
+156%
95−100
−156%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+163%
27−30
−163%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+146%
50−55
−146%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+144%
45−50
−144%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Metro Exodus 76
+153%
30−33
−153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
Valorant 110−120
+164%
45−50
−164%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Dota 2 67
+148%
27−30
−148%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+148%
27−30
−148%
Metro Exodus 25
+150%
10−11
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 92
+163%
35−40
−163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 67
+148%
27−30
−148%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Dota 2 105
+163%
40−45
−163%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+167%
21−24
−167%
Fortnite 45
+150%
18−20
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+163%
24−27
−163%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Valorant 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%

This is how GTX 1070 Ti and P2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Ti is 173% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Ti is 163% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Ti is 162% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.89 15.16
Recency 2 November 2017 15 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3.75 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 1070 Ti has a 143.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 113.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

P2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 140% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 3939 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 111 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.