Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with Radeon Pro Vega 56, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
38.29
+19.7%

GTX 1070 SLI outperforms Pro Vega 56 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking111162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.663.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIVega
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (7 years ago)14 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399
Current price$185 $4999 (12.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1070 SLI has 934% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403584
Core clock speed1506 MHz1247 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rateno data280.0
Floating-point performanceno data9,677 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz786 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data402.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan+1.1.125
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 SLI 38.29
+19.7%
Pro Vega 56 31.99

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 SLI 42691
+66.8%
Pro Vega 56 25589

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 67% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 SLI 34226
+92.3%
Pro Vega 56 17797

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI outperforms Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 92% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD122
+20.8%
101
−20.8%
4K55
−18.2%
65
+18.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 90 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 75−80 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Battlefield 5 120−130 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 64 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Hitman 3 75−80 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 110−120 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65−70 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 48 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85 no data
Hitman 3 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 70−75 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Hitman 3 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and Pro Vega 56 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 21% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 56 is 18% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.29 31.99
Recency 16 August 2016 14 December 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 210 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 56 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop card while Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 203 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.