Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1070 GTX 1070 GDDR5X GTX 1070 SLI GTX 1070 Ti
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
37.63
+689%

GTX 1070 SLI outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 689% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 1070 SLI GTX 1070 SLI
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking128651
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.79
Power efficiency8.719.46
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLILexa
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840512
Core clock speed1506 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data39.01
Floating-point processing powerno data1.248 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+743%
14−16
−743%
4K56
+700%
7−8
−700%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.64
4Kno data21.29

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+855%
10−12
−855%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+618%
10−12
−618%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+855%
10−12
−855%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+594%
18−20
−594%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+618%
10−12
−618%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+833%
12−14
−833%
Fortnite 280
+977%
24−27
−977%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+552%
21−24
−552%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+1056%
9−10
−1056%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+683%
18−20
−683%
Valorant 210−220
+266%
55−60
−266%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+855%
10−12
−855%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+594%
18−20
−594%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+618%
10−12
−618%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+251%
75−80
−251%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%
Dota 2 140−150
+262%
35−40
−262%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+833%
12−14
−833%
Fortnite 176
+577%
24−27
−577%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+552%
21−24
−552%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+1056%
9−10
−1056%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+480%
14−16
−480%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+938%
8−9
−938%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+683%
18−20
−683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+754%
12−14
−754%
Valorant 210−220
+266%
55−60
−266%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+594%
18−20
−594%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+618%
10−12
−618%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%
Dota 2 140−150
+262%
35−40
−262%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+833%
12−14
−833%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+552%
21−24
−552%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+1056%
9−10
−1056%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+683%
18−20
−683%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+462%
12−14
−462%
Valorant 210−220
+266%
55−60
−266%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 123
+373%
24−27
−373%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+383%
6−7
−383%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+615%
30−35
−615%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+1300%
5−6
−1300%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+447%
30−35
−447%
Valorant 240−250
+392%
50−55
−392%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+2967%
3−4
−2967%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+1233%
3−4
−1233%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+950%
8−9
−950%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+800%
10−12
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+800%
7−8
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+911%
9−10
−911%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+406%
16−18
−406%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 0−1
Valorant 210−220
+835%
21−24
−835%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Dota 2 100−110
+593%
14−16
−593%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+983%
6−7
−983%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 38
+660%
5−6
−660%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and PRO WX 2100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 743% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI is 700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1070 SLI is 5500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 SLI surpassed PRO WX 2100 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 37.63 4.77
Recency 16 August 2016 4 June 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1070 SLI has a 688.9% higher aggregate performance score.

PRO WX 2100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 757.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1070 SLI GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
GTX 1070 Ti GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
GTX 1070 SLI GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
vs
RTX 4050 GeForce RTX 4050
PRO WX 3100 PRO WX 3100
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
PRO WX 3100 PRO WX 3100
vs
RTX 4090 Ti RTX 4090 Ti
Xbox One X GPU Xbox One X GPU
vs
Arc A380 Arc A380
Xbox One X GPU Xbox One X GPU
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
P3000 Mobile P3000 Mobile
vs
Quadro K600 K600
Quadro P5200 P5200
vs
RX 480 RX 480
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
G550
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
T1000 Mobile GDDR6 T1000 Mobile GDDR6
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
vs
GeForce 705M 705M
RX Vega 10 RX Vega 10
vs
Arc A780 Arc A780

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI or Radeon PRO WX 2100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.