Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
34.72
+628%

GTX 1070 outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 628% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking150651
Place by popularity26not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.403.79
Power efficiency16.079.46
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Lexa
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 June 2016 (8 years ago)4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 $149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1070 has 517% better value for money than PRO WX 2100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920512
Core clock speed1506 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate202.039.01
Floating-point processing power6.463 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mm168 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 34.72
+628%
PRO WX 2100 4.77

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 13508
+629%
PRO WX 2100 1854

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD117
+631%
16−18
−631%
1440p69
+667%
9−10
−667%
4K49
+717%
6−7
−717%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.24
+187%
9.31
−187%
1440p5.49
+201%
16.56
−201%
4K7.73
+221%
24.83
−221%
  • GTX 1070 has 187% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 has 201% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 has 221% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+764%
10−12
−764%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+545%
10−12
−545%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+722%
9−10
−722%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+764%
10−12
−764%
Battlefield 5 141
+683%
18−20
−683%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+545%
10−12
−545%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+722%
9−10
−722%
Far Cry 5 106
+783%
12−14
−783%
Fortnite 256
+885%
24−27
−885%
Forza Horizon 4 129
+514%
21−24
−514%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+956%
9−10
−956%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 135
+650%
18−20
−650%
Valorant 200−210
+247%
55−60
−247%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 95−100
+764%
10−12
−764%
Battlefield 5 119
+561%
18−20
−561%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+545%
10−12
−545%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+249%
75−80
−249%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+722%
9−10
−722%
Dota 2 130−140
+254%
35−40
−254%
Far Cry 5 100
+733%
12−14
−733%
Fortnite 175
+573%
24−27
−573%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+476%
21−24
−476%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+956%
9−10
−956%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+640%
14−16
−640%
Metro Exodus 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 122
+578%
18−20
−578%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
+823%
12−14
−823%
Valorant 200−210
+247%
55−60
−247%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 107
+494%
18−20
−494%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+545%
10−12
−545%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+722%
9−10
−722%
Dota 2 130−140
+254%
35−40
−254%
Far Cry 5 90
+650%
12−14
−650%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+348%
21−24
−348%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+956%
9−10
−956%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 81
+350%
18−20
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+385%
12−14
−385%
Valorant 200−210
+247%
55−60
−247%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 127
+388%
24−27
−388%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+562%
30−35
−562%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+1180%
5−6
−1180%
Metro Exodus 38
+1167%
3−4
−1167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+447%
30−35
−447%
Valorant 230−240
+374%
50−55
−374%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 84
+2700%
3−4
−2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Far Cry 5 68
+750%
8−9
−750%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+618%
10−12
−618%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+729%
7−8
−729%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+743%
7−8
−743%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 79
+778%
9−10
−778%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Metro Exodus 23
+667%
3−4
−667%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 0−1
Valorant 190−200
+761%
21−24
−761%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Dota 2 95−100
+560%
14−16
−560%
Far Cry 5 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+767%
6−7
−767%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35
+600%
5−6
−600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 39
+680%
5−6
−680%

This is how GTX 1070 and PRO WX 2100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 is 631% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 is 667% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 is 717% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1070 is 4400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 surpassed PRO WX 2100 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.72 4.77
Recency 10 June 2016 4 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1070 has a 627.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO WX 2100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 8954 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 50 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 or Radeon PRO WX 2100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.