Quadro P400 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with Quadro P400, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
38.09
+788%

GTX 1070 SLI outperforms P400 by a whopping 788% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking123680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.50
Power efficiency8.749.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGP107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)7 February 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$119.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840256
Core clock speed1506 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1252 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data20.03
Floating-point processing powerno data0.641 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+883%
12−14
−883%
4K60
+900%
6−7
−900%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.00
4Kno data20.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+888%
8−9
−888%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%
Elden Ring 130−140
+850%
14−16
−850%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+930%
10−11
−930%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+888%
8−9
−888%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+917%
18−20
−917%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+820%
10−11
−820%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+838%
8−9
−838%
Valorant 150−160
+850%
16−18
−850%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+930%
10−11
−930%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+888%
8−9
−888%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%
Dota 2 58
+867%
6−7
−867%
Elden Ring 130−140
+850%
14−16
−850%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+860%
10−11
−860%
Fortnite 160−170
+833%
18−20
−833%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+917%
18−20
−917%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+867%
9−10
−867%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+820%
10−11
−820%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+843%
21−24
−843%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+838%
8−9
−838%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+857%
14−16
−857%
Valorant 150−160
+850%
16−18
−850%
World of Tanks 270−280
+830%
30−33
−830%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+930%
10−11
−930%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+888%
8−9
−888%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+800%
9−10
−800%
Dota 2 120−130
+900%
12−14
−900%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+860%
10−11
−860%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+917%
18−20
−917%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+843%
21−24
−843%
Valorant 150−160
+850%
16−18
−850%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
Elden Ring 75−80
+863%
8−9
−863%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+900%
7−8
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+872%
18−20
−872%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
World of Tanks 240−250
+796%
27−30
−796%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+914%
7−8
−914%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+850%
4−5
−850%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+925%
12−14
−925%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+808%
12−14
−808%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+822%
9−10
−822%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+829%
7−8
−829%
Valorant 110−120
+883%
12−14
−883%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%
Dota 2 81
+800%
9−10
−800%
Elden Ring 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+800%
9−10
−800%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+925%
12−14
−925%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+800%
9−10
−800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+1000%
4−5
−1000%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+875%
4−5
−875%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Dota 2 70−75
+825%
8−9
−825%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+833%
6−7
−833%
Fortnite 41
+925%
4−5
−925%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+800%
7−8
−800%
Valorant 60−65
+933%
6−7
−933%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and Quadro P400 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 883% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI is 900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.09 4.29
Recency 16 August 2016 7 February 2017
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 1070 SLI has a 787.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro P400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop card while Quadro P400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA Quadro P400
Quadro P400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 493 votes

Rate Quadro P400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.