Quadro M2000 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
38.00
+266%

GTX 1070 SLI outperforms M2000 by a whopping 266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.00
Power efficiency8.719.51
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGM206
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840768
Core clock speed1506 MHz796 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz1163 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data55.82
Floating-point processing powerno data1.786 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1653 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 106 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+293%
30−35
−293%
4K56
+300%
14−16
−300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data14.59
4Kno data31.27

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+289%
27−30
−289%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+276%
21−24
−276%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+289%
27−30
−289%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+276%
21−24
−276%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+273%
30−33
−273%
Fortnite 280
+273%
75−80
−273%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+291%
35−40
−291%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+285%
27−30
−285%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+303%
35−40
−303%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+289%
27−30
−289%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+276%
21−24
−276%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+269%
75−80
−269%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Dota 2 140−150
+303%
35−40
−303%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+273%
30−33
−273%
Fortnite 176
+291%
45−50
−291%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+291%
35−40
−291%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+285%
27−30
−285%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+314%
21−24
−314%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+295%
21−24
−295%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+303%
35−40
−303%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+270%
30−33
−270%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+276%
21−24
−276%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Dota 2 140−150
+303%
35−40
−303%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+273%
30−33
−273%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+291%
35−40
−291%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+285%
27−30
−285%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+303%
35−40
−303%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+306%
18−20
−306%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 123
+310%
30−33
−310%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+274%
65−70
−274%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+289%
18−20
−289%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+325%
12−14
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+289%
45−50
−289%
Valorant 240−250
+278%
65−70
−278%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+283%
24−27
−283%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+300%
21−24
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+267%
27−30
−267%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+294%
16−18
−294%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+283%
24−27
−283%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+286%
21−24
−286%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+286%
14−16
−286%
Valorant 210−220
+291%
55−60
−291%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+300%
14−16
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Dota 2 100−110
+285%
27−30
−285%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+275%
12−14
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+280%
10−11
−280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+275%
12−14
−275%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 38
+280%
10−11
−280%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and Quadro M2000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 293% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI is 300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.00 10.37
Recency 16 August 2016 8 April 2016
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 1070 SLI has a 266.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 216 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI or Quadro M2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.