Radeon Sky 500 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with Radeon Sky 500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
40.14
+256%

1070 SLI Mobile outperforms Sky 500 by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking119459
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.80
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIPitcairn
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (9 years ago)27 March 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961280
Core clock speed1443 MHz950 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors14400 Million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data76.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.432 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data154 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+294%
35−40
−294%
4K78
+271%
21−24
−271%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+270%
60−65
−270%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+267%
30−33
−267%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+289%
35−40
−289%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+270%
60−65
−270%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Fortnite 170−180
+287%
45−50
−287%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+290%
40−45
−290%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+263%
35−40
−263%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+293%
40−45
−293%
Valorant 230−240
+258%
65−70
−258%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+289%
35−40
−289%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+270%
60−65
−270%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+272%
75−80
−272%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Dota 2 140−150
+265%
40−45
−265%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Fortnite 170−180
+287%
45−50
−287%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+290%
40−45
−290%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+263%
35−40
−263%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+280%
35−40
−280%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+259%
27−30
−259%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+278%
27−30
−278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+273%
45−50
−273%
Valorant 230−240
+258%
65−70
−258%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+289%
35−40
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+296%
24−27
−296%
Dota 2 140−150
+265%
40−45
−265%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+290%
40−45
−290%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+288%
24−27
−288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+270%
27−30
−270%
Valorant 230−240
+258%
65−70
−258%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+287%
45−50
−287%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+285%
27−30
−285%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+279%
75−80
−279%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+300%
21−24
−300%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+275%
16−18
−275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+289%
45−50
−289%
Valorant 260−270
+277%
70−75
−277%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+281%
27−30
−281%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+300%
12−14
−300%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+263%
27−30
−263%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+290%
30−33
−290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+271%
21−24
−271%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+260%
30−33
−260%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+271%
24−27
−271%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+270%
10−11
−270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+300%
18−20
−300%
Valorant 240−250
+278%
65−70
−278%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+261%
18−20
−261%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+292%
12−14
−292%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%
Dota 2 110−120
+280%
30−33
−280%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+286%
14−16
−286%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+271%
21−24
−271%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 37
+270%
10−11
−270%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+286%
14−16
−286%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and Sky 500 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 294% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 271% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.14 11.29
Recency 16 August 2016 27 March 2013
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 256% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Sky 500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Sky 500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon Sky 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile or Radeon Sky 500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.