GeForce FX 5950 Ultra vs GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLINV38
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)23 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speed1443 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors14400 Million135 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data74 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.800
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz475 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data30.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_19.0a
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 August 2016 23 October 2003
Chip lithography 16 nm 130 nm

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and GeForce FX 5950 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 101 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 76 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.