Radeon HD 6990 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with Radeon HD 6990, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
40.14
+438%

1070 SLI Mobile outperforms HD 6990 by a whopping 438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking119582
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.60
Power efficiencyno data1.53
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIAntilles
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 August 2016 (9 years ago)8 March 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961536 ×2
Core clock speed1443 MHz830 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors14400 Million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data375 Watt
Texture fill rateno data79.68 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data2.55 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data32 ×2
TMUsno data96 ×2
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data295 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 40.14
+438%
HD 6990 7.46

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile 32969
+466%
HD 6990 5830

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+475%
24−27
−475%
4K78
+457%
14−16
−457%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data29.13
4Kno data49.93

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+455%
40−45
−455%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+494%
16−18
−494%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+511%
18−20
−511%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+467%
24−27
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+455%
40−45
−455%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+494%
16−18
−494%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+514%
21−24
−514%
Fortnite 170−180
+480%
30−33
−480%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+478%
27−30
−478%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+505%
21−24
−505%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+481%
27−30
−481%
Valorant 230−240
+483%
40−45
−483%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+467%
24−27
−467%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+455%
40−45
−455%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+458%
50−55
−458%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+494%
16−18
−494%
Dota 2 140−150
+441%
27−30
−441%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+514%
21−24
−514%
Fortnite 170−180
+480%
30−33
−480%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+478%
27−30
−478%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+505%
21−24
−505%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+454%
24−27
−454%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+439%
18−20
−439%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+467%
18−20
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 168
+460%
30−33
−460%
Valorant 230−240
+483%
40−45
−483%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+467%
24−27
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+494%
16−18
−494%
Dota 2 140−150
+441%
27−30
−441%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+514%
21−24
−514%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+478%
27−30
−478%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+481%
16−18
−481%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+456%
18−20
−456%
Valorant 230−240
+483%
40−45
−483%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+480%
30−33
−480%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+478%
18−20
−478%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+468%
50−55
−468%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
+500%
14−16
−500%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+500%
10−11
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+483%
30−33
−483%
Valorant 260−270
+487%
45−50
−487%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+472%
18−20
−472%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+444%
18−20
−444%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+457%
21−24
−457%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+457%
14−16
−457%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+500%
18−20
−500%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+488%
8−9
−488%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+456%
16−18
−456%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+517%
6−7
−517%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+500%
12−14
−500%
Valorant 240−250
+447%
45−50
−447%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+488%
8−9
−488%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Dota 2 110−120
+443%
21−24
−443%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+457%
14−16
−457%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 37
+517%
6−7
−517%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and HD 6990 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 475% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 457% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.14 7.46
Recency 16 August 2016 8 March 2011
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 438% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6990 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 6990 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6990 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile or Radeon HD 6990, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.