Quadro NVS 320M vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with Quadro NVS 320M, including specs and performance data.
1070 SLI Mobile outperforms 320M by a whopping 7978% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 117 | 1293 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.92 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Pascal GP104 SLI | G84 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 August 2016 (9 years ago) | 9 June 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1443 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 14400 Million | 289 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 20 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 9.200 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.0736 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 32 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | no data | MXM-HE |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 22.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | no data | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | + | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 138
+13700%
| 1−2
−13700%
|
| 4K | 78 | 0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+11050%
|
2−3
−11050%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+9400%
|
1−2
−9400%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 95−100
+1820%
|
5−6
−1820%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+13500%
|
1−2
−13500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+11050%
|
2−3
−11050%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+9400%
|
1−2
−9400%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+12000%
|
1−2
−12000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+12900%
|
1−2
−12900%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+8650%
|
2−3
−8650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+3825%
|
4−5
−3825%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 95−100
+1820%
|
5−6
−1820%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160
+1875%
|
8−9
−1875%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+767%
|
27−30
−767%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+13500%
|
1−2
−13500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230
+11050%
|
2−3
−11050%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+1541%
|
16−18
−1541%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+9400%
|
1−2
−9400%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+1227%
|
10−12
−1227%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+12000%
|
1−2
−12000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+12900%
|
1−2
−12900%
|
| Fortnite | 170−180
+8650%
|
2−3
−8650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+3825%
|
4−5
−3825%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 130−140
+13200%
|
1−2
−13200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 95−100
+1820%
|
5−6
−1820%
|
| Metro Exodus | 95−100 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 102
+1175%
|
8−9
−1175%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 168
+3260%
|
5−6
−3260%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+767%
|
27−30
−767%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+13500%
|
1−2
−13500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+9400%
|
1−2
−9400%
|
| Dota 2 | 140−150
+1227%
|
10−12
−1227%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 120−130
+12000%
|
1−2
−12000%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 130−140
+12900%
|
1−2
−12900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+3825%
|
4−5
−3825%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 95−100
+1820%
|
5−6
−1820%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 93
+1063%
|
8−9
−1063%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 100
+1900%
|
5−6
−1900%
|
| Valorant | 230−240
+767%
|
27−30
−767%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 170−180
+8650%
|
2−3
−8650%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+3367%
|
3−4
−3367%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 280−290
+14200%
|
2−3
−14200%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 85−90
+8400%
|
1−2
−8400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+3400%
|
5−6
−3400%
|
| Valorant | 260−270
+8733%
|
3−4
−8733%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+10200%
|
1−2
−10200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 95−100
+4750%
|
2−3
−4750%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 95−100
+9800%
|
1−2
−9800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
+5750%
|
2−3
−5750%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 75−80
+7700%
|
1−2
−7700%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 100−110 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 90−95
+543%
|
14−16
−543%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 72 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 240−250
+8167%
|
3−4
−8167%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 110−120
+11300%
|
1−2
−11300%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 37
+1750%
|
2−3
−1750%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 50−55
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and NVS 320M compete in popular games:
- GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 13700% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 14200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 1070 SLI Mobile surpassed NVS 320M in all 32 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 40.39 | 0.50 |
| Recency | 16 August 2016 | 9 June 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 80 nm |
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 7978% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 320M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
