GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro NVS 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
110M 120M 130M 135M 140M 150M 160M 300M 320M 510M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q MX150 GP107 MX350

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 320M with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

NVS 320M
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 20 Watt
0.50

1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 320M by a whopping 2440% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
NVS 320M NVS 320M
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1293429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.9213.01
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameG84GP107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 June 2007 (18 years ago)3 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32768
Core clock speed575 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1417 MHz
Number of transistors289 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate9.20068.02
Floating-point processing power0.0736 TFLOPS2.177 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1648
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cache32 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.16.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 320M 0.50
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 12.70
+2440%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 320M 208
Samples: 45
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5312
+2454%
Samples: 1972

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%
1440p1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
4K0−119

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1575%
67
+1575%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Valorant 27−30
−315%
110−120
+315%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−959%
180−190
+959%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 10−12
−791%
98
+791%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1425%
61
+1425%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
Metro Exodus 0−1 31
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−820%
46
+820%
Valorant 27−30
−315%
110−120
+315%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Dota 2 10−12
−755%
94
+755%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1075%
47
+1075%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−360%
21−24
+360%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−400%
25
+400%
Valorant 27−30
−315%
110−120
+315%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−4750%
95−100
+4750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−2080%
100−110
+2080%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 14−16
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 27−30

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−157%
36
+157%
Valorant 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how NVS 320M and GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 2750% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 2800% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 4750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q performs better in 32 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.50 12.70
Recency 9 June 2007 3 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

NVS 320M has 275% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 2440% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 320M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Quadro NVS 320M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 320M Quadro NVS 320M
vs
NVS 5100M NVS 5100M
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
NVS 320M Quadro NVS 320M
vs
FX 880M Quadro FX 880M
Go 7800 GTX Go 7800 GTX
vs
8200M G mGPU 8200M G mGPU AMD
Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS
vs
ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 Mobility FireGL V5000
Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS
vs
RTX 4010 RTX 4010
NVS 320M NVS 320M
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB GTX 1060 Max-Q 3 GB
NVS 320M NVS 320M
vs
GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB
NVS 320M NVS 320M
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GTX 1050 Max-Q
NVS 320M NVS 320M
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q GTX 1050 3 GB Max-Q
NVS 320M NVS 320M
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
NVS 320M NVS 320M
vs
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
9600M GT 9600M GT
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 113 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 320M or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.