GeForce 8400 GS vs GTX 1070 SLI Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile with GeForce 8400 GS, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
42.06
+10415%

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile outperforms 8400 GS by a whopping 10415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking941256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.69
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIG86
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409616
Core clock speed1443 MHz459 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors14400 Million210 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data40 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.672
Floating-point processing powerno data0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB256 MB
Standard memory config per GPUno data256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD138
+13700%
1−2
−13700%
4K750−1

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data29.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75 0−1
Battlefield 5 130−140
+13100%
1−2
−13100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 0−1
Far Cry 5 85−90 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+19500%
1−2
−19500%
Hitman 3 85−90 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+16900%
1−2
−16900%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+12900%
1−2
−12900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+15100%
1−2
−15100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+13000%
1−2
−13000%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75 0−1
Battlefield 5 130−140
+13100%
1−2
−13100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 0−1
Far Cry 5 85−90 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+19500%
1−2
−19500%
Hitman 3 85−90 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+16900%
1−2
−16900%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+12900%
1−2
−12900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+15100%
1−2
−15100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170
+16900%
1−2
−16900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+13000%
1−2
−13000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 0−1
Far Cry 5 85−90 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+19500%
1−2
−19500%
Hitman 3 85−90 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+16900%
1−2
−16900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 150−160
+15100%
1−2
−15100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+13000%
1−2
−13000%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+11350%
2−3
−11350%
Hitman 3 50−55 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95 0−1
Metro Exodus 75−80 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 100−110 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+19700%
1−2
−19700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 0−1
Hitman 3 30−35 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+18600%
1−2
−18600%
Metro Exodus 50−55 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 0−1

This is how GTX 1070 SLI Mobile and 8400 GS compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is 13700% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.06 0.40
Recency 16 August 2016 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 16 nm 80 nm

GTX 1070 SLI Mobile has a 10415% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 8400 GS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS
GeForce 8400 GS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 101 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 632 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.