Radeon HD 6990M vs GeForce GT 750M SLI

Place in performance ranking	523	578
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	1.26	2.03
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	N14P-GT	Blackcomb XTX
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years old)	12 July 2011 (12 years old)
Current price	$545	$190

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 6990M has 61% better value for money than GT 750M SLI.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1120
Core clock speed	967 MHz	715 MHz
Number of transistors	1300 Million	1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	40.04
Floating-point performance	no data	1,601.6 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 750M SLI and Radeon HD 6990M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2x 2 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 - 5000 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	115.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.0
OpenGL	no data	4.4
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 750M SLI 6.88
+31.8%

HD 6990M 5.22

GeForce GT 750M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 6990M by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 750M SLI 16142
+6.8%

HD 6990M 15113

GeForce GT 750M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 6990M by 7% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 750M SLI 4634
+43.6%

HD 6990M 3227

GeForce GT 750M SLI outperforms Radeon HD 6990M by 44% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	70−75 +29.6%	54 −29.6%
Full HD	57 −5.3%	60 +5.3%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12
+22.2%

9−10

−22.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +17.6%	16−18 −17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Hitman 3	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +17.6%	16−18 −17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
Hitman 3	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +30%	10−11 −30%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +20%	10−11 −20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +23.1%	12−14 −23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +37.5%	16−18 −37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +41.2%	16−18 −41.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Hitman 3	10−12 +22.2%	9−10 −22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Hitman 3	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Battlefield 5	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +75%	4−5 −75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2	0−1