Radeon 890M vs GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	285	255
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	27.75	no data
Power efficiency	17.03	100.00
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code name	GP106	Strix Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$237.11	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	1024
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	133.6	185.6
Floating-point processing power	4.275 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	32
TMUs	80	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 Mobile 19.75

Radeon 890M 21.75
+10.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1060 Mobile 14693

Radeon 890M 16023
+9.1%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1060 Mobile 34127

Radeon 890M 46360
+35.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1060 Mobile 11558
+20.7%

Radeon 890M 9573

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1060 Mobile 74605
+36.4%

Radeon 890M 54704

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1060 Mobile 3581
+1.3%

Radeon 890M 3533

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	68 +54.5%	44 −54.5%
1440p	44 −2.3%	45−50 +2.3%
4K	30 +0%	30−35 +0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.49	no data
1440p	5.39	no data
4K	7.90	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40 −20%	48 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	37 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	63 −7.9%	65−70 +7.9%
Counter-Strike 2	31 −25.8%	39 +25.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
Forza Horizon 4	106 +39.5%	76 −39.5%
Forza Horizon 5	67 +15.5%	55−60 −15.5%
Metro Exodus	69 +19%	55−60 −19%
Red Dead Redemption 2	74 +51%	45−50 −51%
Valorant	86 −2.3%	85−90 +2.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	73 +7.4%	65−70 −7.4%
Counter-Strike 2	27 −11.1%	30 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Dota 2	49 −12.2%	55 +12.2%
Far Cry 5	70 +48.9%	47 −48.9%
Fortnite	94 −20.2%	110−120 +20.2%
Forza Horizon 4	80 +25%	64 −25%
Forza Horizon 5	41 −41.5%	55−60 +41.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	74 +34.5%	55 −34.5%
Metro Exodus	49 −18.4%	55−60 +18.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	204 +42.7%	140−150 −42.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 −81.5%	45−50 +81.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75 +8.7%	65−70 −8.7%
Valorant	53 −66%	85−90 +66%
World of Tanks	222 −9%	240−250 +9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	57 −19.3%	65−70 +19.3%
Counter-Strike 2	23 −13%	26 +13%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Dota 2	118 −1.7%	120−130 +1.7%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −7.6%	70−75 +7.6%
Forza Horizon 4	68 +23.6%	55 −23.6%
Forza Horizon 5	45 −28.9%	55−60 +28.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55 −160%	140−150 +160%
Valorant	72 −22.2%	85−90 +22.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	30−35 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −12.5%	35−40 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −5.9%	180−190 +5.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 −17.6%	20−22 +17.6%
World of Tanks	130−140 −9%	140−150 +9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 −4.8%	40−45 +4.8%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −13.2%	60−65 +13.2%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −11.8%	55−60 +11.8%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −12.9%	35−40 +12.9%
Metro Exodus	45 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −10.7%	30−35 +10.7%
Valorant	46 −23.9%	55−60 +23.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Dota 2	30−35 −8.8%	35−40 +8.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −12.1%	35−40 +12.1%
Metro Exodus	14 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	64 −3.1%	65−70 +3.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	11 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −12.1%	35−40 +12.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +0%	21−24 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	30−35 −2.9%	35−40 +2.9%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −12%	27−30 +12%
Fortnite	26 +0%	24−27 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −13.8%	30−35 +13.8%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Valorant	23 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%

This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and Radeon 890M compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is 55% faster in 1080p
Radeon 890M is 2% faster in 1440p
A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1060 Mobile is 51% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 890M is 160% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is ahead in 11 tests (20%)
Radeon 890M is ahead in 41 test (75%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.75	21.75
Recency	15 August 2016	15 July 2024
Chip lithography	16 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 890M has a 10.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 890M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.