Quadro 2000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

Place in the ranking	281	837
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	27.15	0.15
Power efficiency	16.87	2.72
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP106	GF106
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)	24 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$237.11	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 Mobile has 18000% better value for money than Quadro 2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	192
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	625 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,400 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	62 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	133.6	20.00
Floating-point processing power	4.275 TFLOPS	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	80	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	178 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	650 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	68 +750%	8−9 −750%
1440p	44 +780%	5−6 −780%
4K	28 +833%	3−4 −833%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.49	74.88
1440p	5.39	119.80
4K	8.47	199.67

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

+825%

4−5
−825%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +786%	7−8 −786%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53 +783%	6−7 −783%
Battlefield 5	78 +767%	9−10 −767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	61 +771%	7−8 −771%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +900%	3−4 −900%
Far Cry 5	75 +733%	9−10 −733%
Far Cry New Dawn	76 +744%	9−10 −744%
Forza Horizon 4	229 +748%	27−30 −748%
Hitman 3	54 +800%	6−7 −800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	136 +750%	16−18 −750%
Metro Exodus	81 +710%	10−11 −710%
Red Dead Redemption 2	74 +722%	9−10 −722%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	119 +750%	14−16 −750%
Watch Dogs: Legion	137 +756%	16−18 −756%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	91 +810%	10−11 −810%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45 +800%	5−6 −800%
Battlefield 5	69 +763%	8−9 −763%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55 +817%	6−7 −817%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 +733%	3−4 −733%
Far Cry 5	59 +743%	7−8 −743%
Far Cry New Dawn	58 +729%	7−8 −729%
Forza Horizon 4	210 +775%	24−27 −775%
Hitman 3	51 +750%	6−7 −750%
Horizon Zero Dawn	134 +738%	16−18 −738%
Metro Exodus	70 +775%	8−9 −775%
Red Dead Redemption 2	62 +786%	7−8 −786%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80 +789%	9−10 −789%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	122 +771%	14−16 −771%
Watch Dogs: Legion	133 +731%	16−18 −731%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +825%	4−5 −825%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +850%	4−5 −850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40 +900%	4−5 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 +1050%	2−3 −1050%
Far Cry 5	43 +760%	5−6 −760%
Forza Horizon 4	71 +788%	8−9 −788%
Hitman 3	45 +800%	5−6 −800%
Horizon Zero Dawn	66 +725%	8−9 −725%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	68 +750%	8−9 −750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +875%	4−5 −875%
Watch Dogs: Legion	28 +833%	3−4 −833%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+743%

7−8
−743%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	41 +720%	5−6 −720%
Far Cry New Dawn	40 +900%	4−5 −900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +800%	3−4 −800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27 +800%	3−4 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27 +800%	3−4 −800%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Far Cry 5	28 +833%	3−4 −833%
Forza Horizon 4	173 +724%	21−24 −724%
Hitman 3	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	48 +860%	5−6 −860%
Metro Exodus	45 +800%	5−6 −800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +780%	5−6 −780%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +733%	3−4 −733%
Watch Dogs: Legion	129 +706%	16−18 −706%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40
+900%

4−5

−900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	22 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Far Cry New Dawn	21 +950%	2−3 −950%
Hitman 3	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	59 +743%	7−8 −743%
Metro Exodus	22 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +767%	3−4 −767%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 +800%	2−3 −800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 +900%	1−2 −900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	13 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	14 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Forza Horizon 4	35 +775%	4−5 −775%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +1100%	2−3 −1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

20
+900%

2−3

−900%

This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and Quadro 2000 compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is 750% faster in 1080p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 780% faster in 1440p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 833% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.70	2.46
Recency	15 August 2016	24 December 2010
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	62 Watt

GTX 1060 Mobile has a 700.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro 2000, on the other hand, has 29% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro 2000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.