Quadro FX 770M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile with Quadro FX 770M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
10.06
+1996%

1050 Mobile outperforms 770M by a whopping 1996% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4681280
Place by popularity75not in top-100
Power efficiency10.811.11
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP107BG96
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)14 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$527

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64032
Core clock speed1354 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.728.000
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4016
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA+1.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
Full HD46
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
1440p24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
4K150−1

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data263.50
1440pno data527.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Far Cry 5 39 0−1
Fortnite 132
+2100%
6−7
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+1000%
5−6
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 46
+475%
8−9
−475%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+835%
16−18
−835%
Dota 2 126
+1045%
10−12
−1045%
Far Cry 5 36 0−1
Fortnite 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+940%
5−6
−940%
Grand Theft Auto V 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Metro Exodus 19 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 41
+413%
8−9
−413%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+680%
5−6
−680%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 37
+3600%
1−2
−3600%
Dota 2 115
+945%
10−12
−945%
Far Cry 5 33 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 37
+640%
5−6
−640%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 29
+263%
8−9
−263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+340%
5−6
−340%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+4000%
2−3
−4000%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Metro Exodus 11 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Far Cry 5 21
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+1200%
2−3
−1200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 25 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+46.7%
14−16
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 13 0−1
Dota 2 34
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Far Cry 5 11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 15 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12
+500%
2−3
−500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10
+400%
2−3
−400%

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and FX 770M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 2333% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 2200% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 2300% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Mobile is 4000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile performs better in 16 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.06 0.48
Recency 3 January 2017 14 August 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile has a 1995.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 681.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

FX 770M, on the other hand, has 114.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1456 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 31 votes

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile or Quadro FX 770M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.