Radeon RX 6300M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Radeon RX 6300M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.40

RX 6300M outperforms GTX 1050 Ti by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking331328
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.03no data
Power efficiency15.0232.71
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed1291 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82115.2
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.40
RX 6300M 16.67
+1.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6318
RX 6300M 6422
+1.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
+0%
50−55
+0%
1440p29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
4K24
+0%
24−27
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.78no data
1440p4.79no data
4K5.79no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+5%
100−105
−5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Metro Exodus 56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
+2033%
3−4
−2033%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 44
+10%
40−45
−10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+5%
100−105
−5%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Metro Exodus 46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+975%
4−5
−975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hitman 3 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Metro Exodus 29
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−1%
100−105
+1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+3.8%
80−85
−3.8%
Metro Exodus 14
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 7% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 2033% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1050 Ti surpassed RX 6300M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.40 16.67
Recency 25 October 2016 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6300M, on the other hand, has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon RX 6300M.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6300M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 6300M
Radeon RX 6300M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 206980 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.