Radeon RX 5600M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Place in performance ranking	306	229
Place by popularity	7	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.07	34.97
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	N17P-G1	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 October 2016 (7 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	no data
Current price	$207 (1.5x MSRP)	$525

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600M has 476% better value for money than GTX 1050 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	2304
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	1265 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	60 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	66.82	182.2
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon RX 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.32

RX 5600M 22.49
+37.8%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 38% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Ti 6315

RX 5600M 8705
+37.8%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 38% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1050 Ti 9453

RX 5600M 24213
+156%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 156% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1050 Ti 7485

RX 5600M 17653
+136%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 136% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1050 Ti 50939

RX 5600M 72335
+42%

Radeon RX 5600M outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by 42% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	51 −66.7%	85 +66.7%
1440p	30 −90%	57 +90%
4K	26 −19.2%	31 +19.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

−38.5%

35−40
+38.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 −39.6%	67 +39.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −150%	70 +150%
Battlefield 5	63 −81%	114 +81%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 −40.5%	55−60 +40.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −38.5%	35−40 +38.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −37.2%	55−60 +37.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	48 −60.4%	77 +60.4%
Forza Horizon 4	69 −10.1%	75−80 +10.1%
Hitman 3	45−50 −43.5%	65−70 +43.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −138%	81 +138%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 −106%	72 +106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 −187%	89 +187%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −152%	78 +152%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 −50%	60 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −107%	58 +107%
Battlefield 5	52 −115%	112 +115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	39 −51.3%	55−60 +51.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −38.5%	35−40 +38.5%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −37.2%	55−60 +37.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	45 −64.4%	74 +64.4%
Forza Horizon 4	64 −18.8%	75−80 +18.8%
Hitman 3	45−50 −43.5%	65−70 +43.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −94.1%	66 +94.1%
Metro Exodus	26 −127%	59 +127%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18 −122%	40 +122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 −185%	77 +185%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	49 −112%	104 +112%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −126%	70 +126%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24 −104%	49 +104%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −60.7%	45 +60.7%
Battlefield 5	51 −108%	106 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −38.5%	35−40 +38.5%
Far Cry 5	36 −122%	80 +122%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 −63.4%	67 +63.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45 −68.9%	75−80 +68.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −146%	64 +146%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −3.2%	32 +3.2%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24 −41.7%	30−35 +41.7%
Hitman 3	24−27 −42.3%	35−40 +42.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −86.4%	41 +86.4%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −46.7%	21−24 +46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −108%	25 +108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −71.4%	24 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	36 −128%	82 +128%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −40.7%	35−40 +40.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	29 −48.3%	40−45 +48.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −43.8%	45−50 +43.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −52.9%	24−27 +52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −160%	26 +160%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Hitman 3	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −9.1%	12 +9.1%
Metro Exodus	9 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −75%	14 +75%
Battlefield 5	18 −128%	41 +128%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −46.2%	18−20 +46.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	14 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	20 −60%	30−35 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −85.7%	13 +85.7%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and RX 5600M compete in popular games:

RX 5600M is 67% faster in 1080p
RX 5600M is 90% faster in 1440p
RX 5600M is 19% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5600M is 187% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 5600M surpassed GTX 1050 Ti in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.32	22.49
Recency	25 October 2016	7 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	60 Watt